Originally posted by birch23
The only problem in Frodon's suggestion is that it will still leave quite a no.of SS and pro regime generals within the file.von Rundstedt was like Manstein a.o.they had severe trouble personally morally to support a coup because it meant going back on their oath.
Canaris opposed Hitler from day 1,but he preferred to play hiw own little game.He commited high treason when he warned Sas (Holland) about the upcoming invasion,and the same with Lunding (Denmark).It is one of the greater mysteries of the Reich why he wasn't removed way before 20th.July.There were replacements enough. (Schellenberg to mention one)
I do see the point about having do many SS and pro-regime leaders left. That said, many of them were merely opportunists of the first order, and not so loyal as may be supposed. Speer would be the prime example of this. They'll back the winner, and betray who they have to to remain in their positions. Both Manstein and Von Rundstadt, while not actively supporting a coup, would in fact do so by not reacting to it. That is, keeping everything focused on their front against the enemy at hand. In any outcome, the army goes with its most respected leaders, which by 1944 are Von Rundstadt and Manstein. Beck, Von Witleben, et al, were for the most part, out of touch with the army, having been removed from command 2-3 years prior to the 44 attempt. This is evidenced by Beck being ignored when he showed up at GHQ giving orders, which were promptly ignored.
As for Canaris, Hitler found him a useful foil against Himmler (and primarily Heydrich). The Abwher-SD fights were legendary in their territorial disputes. the relationship between Himmler/Heydrich, and Canaris (as well as Raeder), were useful to Hitler in the way it distracted them from doing anything else but fending off the others. It kept Hitler's potential rivals at each other, rather than at him.