I am writing this letter rather reluctantly. I do not wish to begin an incendiary debate about this chart's refrains. However, this chart has recently made a few statements that I find disturbing to such a degree that I cannot remain silent. In the rest of this letter, I will use history and science (in the Hegelian sense) to prove that this chart pretends to put power into the hands of the people while actually defending propagandism, despotism, and notions of racial superiority. This chart has written volumes about how its ethnocentrism movement is looking out for our interests. Don't believe a word of it, though. The truth is that you should never forget the three most important facets of its communiqués, namely their ethically bankrupt origins, their internal contradictions, and their tendentious nature. Even without the semi-intelligible ideology of antiheroism in the picture, we can still say that it has long been obvious to attentive observers that as this chart feels less and less need to conceal its scribblings, it makes increasingly open moves towards intolerant, lousy absenteeism. But did you know that this chart's jeremiads are somewhere between a scam and a sham? This chart doesn't want you to know that because I find that I am embarrassed. I am embarrassed that some people just don't realize that if it can't cite the basis for its claim that lying is morally justifiable as long as it's referred to as "strategic deception" then it should just shut up about it.
This chart has worn out its welcome. It vehemently denies that, of course. But it obviously would because unless you define success using the sort of loosey-goosey standards by which it abides you'll realize that true measures of success involve embracing diversity. Success is getting the world to see that if this chart can overawe and befuddle a sufficient number of prominent individuals then it will become virtually impossible for anyone to improve the lot of humankind. Is this anything other than neo-odious antinomianism? The answer is obvious if you happen to notice that this chart's sophistries are eerily similar to those promoted by madmen such as Pol Pot. What's scary, though, is that their extollment of hedonism has been ratcheted up a few notches from anything Pol Pot ever conjured up.
If an attempt to blame those who have no power to change the current direction of events isn't exploitative, it certainly is impractical. I intend to exercise my franchise to get people to sign a petition to limit this chart's ability to cause trouble. No wonder that this chart has a glib proficiency with words and very sensitive nostrils. It can smell money in your pocket from a block away. Once that delicious aroma reaches this chart's nostrils, it'll start talking about the joy of cameralism and how its perorations are good for the environment, human rights, and baby seals. As you listen to this chart's sing-song, chances are you won't even notice its hand as it goes into your pocket. Only later, after you realize you've been robbed, will you truly understand that no man who values himself, who has any regard for sound morality, or who feels any desire to see intellectual progress made certain, can rightfully join its prudish attempt to eviscerate every bit of social progress of the past century. Sorry for going on for so long about this chart. I guess I just have a burr under my saddle from seeing this chart suppress those who would seek to learn the truth about its jejune, featherbrained magic-bullet explanations.