You want your AI allies to start abandoning you (they tend to do so when you've got differing ideologies)?
That's up to all the players.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
You want your AI allies to start abandoning you (they tend to do so when you've got differing ideologies)?
That's up to all the players.
What if AUS is against all of the alliances? (Canada will be protected by Germany)
Samilou can you post a list of the provinces (with id nummer) you wanted cores on?
Even if we would play without AUS what would Russia do then? Wait for the inevitable if the central powers win against France and Britain?
Samilou can you post a list of the provinces (with id nummer) you wanted cores on?
Even if we would play without AUS what would Russia do then? Wait for the inevitable if the central powers win against France and Britain?
you all act as if im a big bloody power. I have a small army compared with the rest of you, I have very few manpower to build anything larger too.
Also ludovico calling me a not so good player? You go rot in hell, just because I do not go along the lines of inf spam, or even tank spam(as most players in this game seem bent on doing) and prefer something more elaborated as strategy does not make me a bad player.
Also ludovico calling me a not so good player? You go rot in hell, just because I do not go along the lines of inf spam, or even tank spam(as most players in this game seem bent on doing) and prefer something more elaborated as strategy does not make me a bad player.
Last edited:
How much manpower growth? I believe you have enough for a strong military in the long term, and you have the most IC of us all which WILL make you very powerful in the long term.
You could just copy China's cores from vanilla to simplify it.
As Pepsi posted, let's keep the alliances as they are and don't complicate it. 
Please add Qing cores for China and wait for Russia and Japan to decide whether they want to be edited into Syndicalists or fight against MittelEuropa independently.
UoB, CoF, Russia, Japan VS. GER, AUS-HUN, AUS, Qing, Canada is a good and fair setup IMO. I don't want to play the game where one big alliance easily crushes the other one. This type of games is unfair, boring and lame.
You CAN be a big bloody power, quite soon. What is your manpower growth? Something around 1.5 is very very good. I have 0.9 as France.
Sorry, please don't take it personallyo. I didn't mean you are a bad player, only that you intended to play UoB quite illogically IMO. Well, you actually didn't since Pepsi took it over soon enough to make a good use of 1400 manpower in pool - by building the most cost-effective unit in the game - infantry.
Please add Qing cores for China and wait for Russia and Japan to decide whether they want to be edited into Syndicalists or fight against MittelEuropa independently.
UoB, CoF, Russia, Japan VS. GER, AUS-HUN, AUS, Qing, Canada is a good and fair setup IMO. I don't want to play the game where one big alliance easily crushes the other one. This type of games is unfair, boring and lame.
You CAN be a big bloody power, quite soon. What is your manpower growth? Something around 1.5 is very very good. I have 0.9 as France.
Sorry, please don't take it personally
o. I didn't mean you are a bad player, only that you intended to play UoB quite illogically IMO. Well, you actually didn't since Pepsi took it over soon enough to make a good use of 1400 manpower in pool - by building the most cost-effective unit in the game - infantry.
Last edited:
Sorry, please don't take it personally
Well.... I would have done the same thing with that nation. He played UoB quite well. Only the trades were bad..
With AUS, you aren't as powerfull as russia or france....but if the war lasts 2 years you'll become the best power. That's what everybody was saying.
I couldn't convince CG to build land units - at least 150 divs - before the war. He wanted to build air force first but I am quite confident that 200 INF are better than 15 GAR + 25 fighters, that's it.
So, I take it my beloved Russia has been completely changed over last session, gone all syndie and such? And most others changed the coutries they were playing.
Next saturday I'm taking a new one, I don't like to drop a major for a game-changing session and picking it up back... I'll look for some meaningfull regional power around the globe.
Next saturday I'm taking a new one, I don't like to drop a major for a game-changing session and picking it up back... I'll look for some meaningfull regional power around the globe.
You didn't read what everyone said, did you? :rofl:
No, Russia's not syndicate, it will be up to Russia and Japan to decide to join, or be independent.
I got a friend that got hoi2 recently and wants to play so if any major is missing he will be first in line to take ok?If not hell take Italy.
Btw i just got into gameranger so if any1 wants to play with me company of heroes, command and conquer generals (all series) borderlands, rise of nations (all) or some fancy shooter contact me cuz it seems there is a shortage of players with good internet.
Btw i just got into gameranger so if any1 wants to play with me company of heroes, command and conquer generals (all series) borderlands, rise of nations (all) or some fancy shooter contact me cuz it seems there is a shortage of players with good internet.
Last edited:
Russia is still Nationalist Populist and can definitely choose a different side. I'd recommend you keep Russia as that's what you started as.
We have formed two alliances - UoB, CoF, Russia and Japan VERSUS GER, AUS-HUN, American Unionist state, Qing China and Canada. We wait for Russia and Japan to declare if they can be edited into Syndicalists of if they prefer to just fight alongside.
Russia declared to fight with Syndicalists because AUS joined the MittelEuropa without previous talks with Russia and Japan.
Last edited:
I see, but since all my previous arrangements have been cancelled, the alliances have changed, and most importantly, nearly every country had/will have a diferent player, including Germany with whom I had arrangements, there is little continuity for me in regards to Russia. My diplomacy towards this and that country depends a lot on who is playing it, and how I interpret their play style.
I'll see who shows up next saturday, and I could either retake Russia, fill up any major that doesn't show up, or take a regional power. Do we have an uploaded save for this last session? Didn't spot any around here.
Reiko: i dont intend on russia .. i think i took it the way you started in the means of economy .. the alliances changed cause i wanted to see fair war not a war russia germany aus - hun against england - france ... it ended that week germany took america as new ally after i declared i stay away from war ... its 400 ic and i dont like that unfair behavior. You can have russia if you really want it, just there is a problem that if you join germany then that game hadnt prupose for france and england because no skill can beat even lame germany and austria with russia and america ally .. all i was doing in diplomacy was maintaining the status quo
I might not want to play this Saturday as I will have a friend coming to visit me. He can't come very often as he lives quite far from me, so I don't want to miss this rare occasion. Would you like to sub China?
Who?
And besides, we could push it back one week?
Reiko, I suppose.
Please, postpone only when too few players arrive on Sat.