Just a question, please no politics

[ed84]

That is exactly what I said too.

This thread is beyond stupid as the notion of nationality didn't exist during the EU3 or EU4 timeline. Inhabitants of the lands in Bosnia didn't consider themselves Bosnian, Serbian or Croatian or whatever other contraption, they just considered themselves from that mountain valley, that village or town, that forest, or in service/in lands of x noble.

The Bosnia in the EU3/EU4 timeline however, can be considered a successor kingdom to Serbia, from a merely political perspective.

 

[VeneziaIstanbul]

The thing is, there are NO (real) Bosniaks only Converted Croats and Serbs, especially at that time.
All this talk of a separate "Bosniak" identity is nothing but a modern form of identity crisis.

But I do agree, that not all of the provinces in Bosnia should be Serbian, some should be Croatian.
Here is some reading material, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Croats_of_Bosnia_and_Herzegovina

Ps: I hope I do not offend anyone with my statements, I am merely stating facts that some modern historical revisionists are trying to hide.
The roots of most modern "Bosniaks" are Croats or Serbs, but if someone indentifies as something else, thats fine. People living in America don´t indentify as Europeans or English but rather American.

What about the charter of Ban Kulin?