Originally posted by SJG
I think the ships being nigh-on unsinkable might be to offset the fact that they are so expensive. Would it really cost the yearly GDP of a small (say two or three provinces average provinces) country to build one warship? I have no idea, but it seems a little high. If they sunk too often having a reasonable sized navy could be very, very expensive.
Originally posted by Zander
Yes. I don't mind the randomness (well, I do, it drives me crazy, but it makes sense), but battle losses are way too low in naval combats. So far as I recall, it was not unheard of for ships in the Middle Ages to be able to sink other ships from time to time, whereas most naval battles in EU2 pass without a single ship going beneath the waves.
Originally posted by Gwalcmai
Which brings me to another point. Ships in EU2 seem almost unsinkable. In real life, I doubt any naval battle involving 20+ ships would end with no losses on either side. Ok, at least not until the ship-of-the-line tactics of the 18th century.
Originally posted by joak
Well, there is the oft-repeated claim (hopefully not apocryphal, but I'm sure I'll hear it if it is) that not a single ship in the Spanish Armada was sunk by English gunfire--it was the journey back that took a heavy toll.