I wonder to where 'first consul' can be connected
Obviously to Napoleon
Yet in view of incoming Rome ... it might be - Roman ?
Obviously to Napoleon
Yet in view of incoming Rome ... it might be - Roman ?
Last edited:
Sokraates said:Yes, this sounds good.
But "esse delendam" definitely means "has to be destroyed", not "should be destroyed".
Good old Cato didn't mess around with subjunctives.![]()
Ed-Thunder said:I wonder to where 'first consul' can be connected
Obviously to Napoleon
Yet in view of incoming Rome ... it might - Roman ?
Johan said:Won't be any CoT's in Rome. Was none in CK, Victoria or HoI either.
Gothmog said:
.Johan said:Techsystem is completely unique for RomeLuckyDane said:Hmm. Have you made any changes to the EU3 technology system at all?
.Johann said:Kerry said:The "indirect" control of non-capital provinces sounds very very interesting.
I really hope the characters kind of interact with each other. What fun could it be to balance the number of provinces controlled by noble family A with the one gouverned by family B in order to avoid A taking over the power in the state. Could give rebellions a total new depth.
Well...
You will only get to select options for events for your current ruler and his children.
Which in a republic where you elect new consuls every 2 years can be pretty interesting
Like that incompetent buffoon got rich of his governorship in Narbonensis, and now spent alot of cash to boost his popularity with bread and games. And you end up with him as consul..
STGeorge said:6 Unit types surely not.... a single Legion has more than 6 units types!!!!![]()
Surely there will be unique national units????????![]()
Johan said:Quote:
Originally Posted by Deo89
One interesting thing I find is the map view in that screenshot, for me it doesn't look stright, its in a small angle, does this mean we can turn the map however we want?
yes
Balor said:Quote:
Originally Posted by Secret Master
I have question about this lovely barbarian system Johan and the crew have setup.
Johan mentioned that the barbarians could even occupy and overthrow civilized kingdoms and set up their own dynasty of rulers and advisors and whatnot.
My question is whether this counts as a game-losing annexation (i.e. Mongols annexing you in CK) or whether it is more akin to Victoria: Revolutions wherein Communist (or Fascist, or Reactionary, or Anarcho-liberal, etc.) overthrow your government, rewrite the constitution, put a new party into power, but your country still exists and you get to keep playing?
kinda like victoria.
Johan said:Fornadan said:I see we got the standard Paradox rebel unit here.
Will major civil wars be handled any different from previous games? After all they're a pretty major part of the Late Republic (and also the failing Successor states)
There won't be much fun in going against Pompey as Caesar if the opponents are just "rebels". Even worse it would not be possible to chose which side to play as
civil wars will be handled entirely different in rome
.Balor said:there's no babylon in rome.
for me the URL doesn't work, I can't even go to algoco.comhoussamking said: