I don't really understand where the whole "pig iron" thing comes from. Katana (yes, that is the correct plural) are made of Tamahagane, which is different and requires a special process to make... there was a tamahagane shortage in Japan until the 1970s when production resumed, and that wouldn't have happened if they could have just used western pig iron.
Also, there's a LOT of confusion about the whole "one-sided swords" concept. Focusing on one edge makes said edge more effective. Also, Japanese sword styles use that edge exclusively (with the exceptionof iaido iirc), so it stops being a disadvantage.
EDIT: this next point is important: the anti-kats are as bad as the over-the-top katana evangelists, and certainly are as likely to use underhand tactics. For example, the fabled Youtube video where a katana breaks on wood. There are four possibilities:
1. The video is a fake.
2. The katana was not a real nihonto.
3. The video doesn't exist, and is being mentioned on the assumption that nobody will google it.
4. The maker of the video is extremely rich.
I'm sure you'll agree that theory 4 is less likely to be true than the others. Of the others, my guess is that the katana was fake and the user had no idea how to use one and/or deliberately used the blunt side. Fake katana are a thing - they're usually gunto, that is to say 1940s mass-produced machine swords, and are the most common type of sword used in criminal acts in the UK. That isn't to say that the two kinds are impossible to distinguish - it's easy if you know what to look for (http://www.tofugu.com/2015/02/18/view-japanese-sword-like-pro/ gives a good summary, although I regret to say that I'm nowhere near being able to do all of that. How often is it that you get to look at katana anyway?)
Also, there's a LOT of confusion about the whole "one-sided swords" concept. Focusing on one edge makes said edge more effective. Also, Japanese sword styles use that edge exclusively (with the exceptionof iaido iirc), so it stops being a disadvantage.
EDIT: this next point is important: the anti-kats are as bad as the over-the-top katana evangelists, and certainly are as likely to use underhand tactics. For example, the fabled Youtube video where a katana breaks on wood. There are four possibilities:
1. The video is a fake.
2. The katana was not a real nihonto.
3. The video doesn't exist, and is being mentioned on the assumption that nobody will google it.
4. The maker of the video is extremely rich.
I'm sure you'll agree that theory 4 is less likely to be true than the others. Of the others, my guess is that the katana was fake and the user had no idea how to use one and/or deliberately used the blunt side. Fake katana are a thing - they're usually gunto, that is to say 1940s mass-produced machine swords, and are the most common type of sword used in criminal acts in the UK. That isn't to say that the two kinds are impossible to distinguish - it's easy if you know what to look for (http://www.tofugu.com/2015/02/18/view-japanese-sword-like-pro/ gives a good summary, although I regret to say that I'm nowhere near being able to do all of that. How often is it that you get to look at katana anyway?)
Last edited:
- 3