I don't think others would be overly impressed with China building a fleet of big ships and calling them dreadnaughts, at least until their effectiveness had been demonstrated in a serious war against an important country. China has had ships that look big and impressive before.@OP: I agree with you. Perhaps being a leading producer of (for the time) advanced goods together with high GDP or a lot of trade should be viable as well. If in 1905 Japan had sent a locally developed all-big-gun battleship on a world tour that equals the UKs dreadnought, this may have had a similar effect as the victory against as Russia.
1905 drove the point home very quickly. But I believe once Japan had started colonizing Asia and become technologically competitive, e.g. by domestically building cutting edge warships, they would have done so anyway, just a bit later. The process had already started in the 2 decades before 1905, as others in this thread have already shown.
It just does not make sense that European powers would not recognize a technologically leading Qing that can deploy its own Dreadnought fleet* to protect its 40% share of world GDP and world trade.
*the 1910s equivalent to microchips and space rockets as a proof of technological prowess
Part of the reason is that generals always “fight the last war”. In the last war the Chinese fleet wasn't a match for the British, and the only way to change that perception is to demonstrate the effectiveness of the new Chinese navy.
- 1