Is "Voice of the People" what the game really needs now?

[Bowser]

IMO whats most needed is an expansion focused on fleshing out/improving diplomacy and warfare (I'm not against the concept of warfare in the game though). And of course continued work on the existing systems regarding economy in particular (balancing, making qualifications important).

 

[pCWentY]

Does Paradox still remember the promised function of allowing players to create state in game?

 

[Dr. Crabnipples]

I think people don't realize that the developers have probably set a fine long list of priorities well in advance during planning. This is not taking into account for glitches, bugs, balance problems, and glaring issues with the game design. "Voice of the people" has probably been set in motional as a planned DLC well before even game release i bet.

 

[Kipsta]

Maybe it can gives us an idea of what the game could be like if it had content and nuance.

 

[pCWentY]

So there still will be opportunities in the future—— I think rather than modifying states in the Rhine region in DLC, it is better to directly give players in the game a mechanism to freely modify states in DLC . This also can save programmers a lot of trouble and eliminates the need to modify states in future DLC——Players can modify according to their own preferences or needs╰(*°▽°*)╯.

I think people don't realize that the developers have probably set a fine long list of priorities well in advance during planning. This is not taking into account for glitches, bugs, balance problems, and glaring issues with the game design. "Voice of the people" has probably been set in motional as a planned DLC well before even game release i bet.

 

[yurcick]

Does Paradox still remember the promised function of allowing players to create state in game?

Could you elaborate?
State of joy because of the line going up is achievable in the game. State of despair is harder to get, but isn't impossible for a determined and inexperienced player.

 

[grommile]

Does Paradox still remember the promised function of allowing players to create state in game?

Does the person asking that question have a citation for that promise?

(A vague statement that it would be nice to have such functionality if they can make it work well is not a promise.)

 

[Faeelin]

Does the person asking that question have a citation for that promise?

(A vague statement that it would be nice to have such functionality if they can make it work well is not a promise.)

What's it worth for them to find it for you?

 

[grommile]

What's it worth for them to find it for you?

A reputation for being able to back up their rhetoric with facts.

 

[Faeelin]

A reputation for being able to back up their rhetoric with facts.

Ah yes, internet points.

 

[nuarbnellaffej]

Ah yes, internet points.

Nah, if someone makes a claim the burden is on them to offer evidence in support of said claim.

 

[maxk94]

Back to topic, what are you think about everything youve heard so far from next Patch and Voice of the People?

 

[nuarbnellaffej]

Back to topic, what are you think about everything youve heard so far from next Patch and Voice of the People?

It seems okay, but I’d much rather have a military overhaul/fleshing out (especially the naval aspect). But that will probably(hopefully) come in the first major as of yet unnamed expansion pack.

I’m indifferent to the France Specific content, but the agitators and their associated mechanics seem cool.