i normally take one of those two at the start and pick a military idea as the second option, i like the innovative bonuses (especially - war exhaustion). just curious on other players views on them.
Yes, innovative is better. France has more than enough income to be at force limits, so economy is not needed – extra money isn't worth much. I'd probably pick any other admin group over it, with innovative and administrative the top choices. Or something from diplo or mil groups, of course, like influence to gobble up vassals.
That's a false statement if I ever saw one.You can always use more money.
That's a false statement if I ever saw one.
That's also false, and besides the point. First of all, money is only important in the early game and since we are speaking of France, if you are having trouble in the early game it aint the money that's your problem. Secondly, money can only turn into soldiers while you have manpower and avaliable mercenaries.And how can that be then income is the first thing to compare if you wan't to know the relative power of nations.
You can always use more money.
Innovative will not do good at all, admistrative yes but Im not sure it is a better choice, it is maybe more of a preference and what other idea groups you have.