invicible Iraqi destroyer

[Spruce]

very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very very annoying bug,

invincible Iraqi destroyer ship "1RIN Destroyer flotilla",

lost the total japanese navy against this puny ship,

 

[unmerged(15561)]

Can you dig out the poriton of the savegame that represents this unit?

 

[unmerged(23487)]

That was the Saddam's yatch that took 8 direct hits before it sank. :rofl:

 

[Spruce]

Can you dig out the poriton of the savegame that represents this unit?

can you explain? I don't understand poriton?

 

[unmerged(15561)]

Sorry, find the portion, (part of), the savegame file where the Iraqi destroyer information is stored.

I seem to remember a similar 'bug' of this nature. Im hoping that the info will allow me, or others to find out what it is!

 

[unmerged(23238)]

can you explain? I don't understand poriton?

'portion' seems to fit

 

[jdrou]

What patch and scenario are you running?

I seem to remember a similar 'bug' of this nature. Im hoping that the info will allow me, or others to find out what it is!

There were 'invulnerable' units in a couple of patches. The most recent was an Australian division with a typo in its 'type' in the scenario file in the 1944 scenario in 1.06 which was fixed in 1.06b.

 

[Spruce]

What patch and scenario are you running?


There were 'invulnerable' units in a couple of patches. The most recent was an Australian division with a typo in its 'type' in the scenario file in the 1944 scenario in 1.06 which was fixed in 1.06b.

yes, it was also a bug I reported so I'm much angry about this kind of stupid bugs that destroy your entire army!

ok, I'll look it up then

 

[unmerged(15561)]

Well, I can only get a fix reported if users report them.

 

[unmerged(15561)]

What patch and scenario are you running?


There were 'invulnerable' units in a couple of patches. The most recent was an Australian division with a typo in its 'type' in the scenario file in the 1944 scenario in 1.06 which was fixed in 1.06b.

What seems to be the cause. missing bracket?

 

[jdrou]

What seems to be the cause. missing bracket?

No, all other Australian units were type 11156 and the bad one was 1156. Not sure exactly why that would be a problem since nothing else is using type 1156 that I know of. I notice only Canada has a type below 10000 in the 1944 scenario and no one does in 1936 scenario so maybe low types aren't safe.

 

[Spruce]

Well, I can only get a fix reported if users report them.

it's my duty as customer to address the very irritating effect of such things, however I do understand that you and the crew are helping to improve every day,

so don't take it too hard, cheers !

 

[Spruce]

division = {
id = { type = 22500 id = 10 }
name = "1. RIN Destroyer Flotilla"
type = destroyer
model = 0
extra = none
strength = 100.000
organisation = 55.300
defaultorganisation = 60.000
maxspeed = 24.000
supplyconsumption = 0.200
fuelconsumption = 1.000
surfacedetectioncapability = 3.000
airdetectioncapability = 2.000
subdetectioncapability = 9.000
visibility = 50.000
seadefence = 2.000
airdefence = 2.000
seaattack = 2.000
subattack = 3.000
shorebombardment = 1.000
airattack = 0.500
transportcapability = 0.000
aircraftcapacity = 0.000
range = 6000.000
travelled = 20496.447
}
port = 1355
}

 

[jdrou]

What are the next few lines above that (starting with 'navalunit')? Also, how many ships did you have in the battle at once?