Interregnum: Bug Reporting

[MattyG]

the maya conversion is also a bit buggy, I had Sunni conversion come up when I was cordoba and had gone mutazelite, then i trawled through the events files and found that it only triggers as mutazelite rather than sunni if the conversion event comes up where the caliph doesn't dend the letter condemning the mutazelites, after I tried changing it so that it came up if codoba establishes caliphate than the event didn't come up at all and they went hindu instead, looked through it and it says that event 202380 has to come up first. I tried looking for it, it's only there for the mutazelite version though but I couldn't find it, what is event 202380?

EDIT: event 202380 doesn't exist (used the cheat console to activate it) so...

Thanks,

Sorry for the errors that spoiled the game. I will correct this for 6.33.

 

[MattyG]

A few other ahem bugs

The Manchu have two capitals
Lanzhou's city setting is on European - shouldnt it be Chinese?
Lastly, Cymric's Whales province has Cymric culture, why is the state unique then?

PS:

MattyG I cant believe it, but THREE MAJOR countries in Interegnum dont have any historical descriptions! Sicily, Swabia and the Teutonic Order! Shame on you

Changed the city, capital and cymric culture issues for 6.33.

As for country descriptions. Yep, I suck.

 

[unmerged(15247)]

another bug i keep forgeting to report, grrrrrrrrrrr

every 3rd or 4th run i get a straight ctd without warning on PRECISELLY jan1, 1420; so god damm annoying o

 

[unmerged(15247)]

telcemen ai; needs to be toned down in its peace offers; at -50 ws and OFFERING money to it still does not accept; not to mention that no wonder sicilly can NEVER beat it just realized; also keeps 50y old run wars( and a stagnant ai game, etc) untill MAYBE it colapses due to 1500's events

 

[unmerged(31994)]

I was playing Tlemscen and when I had the Taifa of Beleares event I chose "We cant do anything" but it didnt release the island. So I looked into the revolt file and discovered that the province of the revolt is 425 and not 821!!!Check it out Matty for the tag BEA.

Dont Forget to delete the persian leaders file
Check out Leon's file, the tag is for Catalyuna you should check the other Iberian files just in case as well!!!
We need a permenant Casus Belli for the Caliphate against Ill-Khanate - Or perhaps giving her a core on Ahwaz and turning the province's culture into Arabic (The dominant culture in Real Life).

 

[MattyG]

another bug i keep forgeting to report, grrrrrrrrrrr

every 3rd or 4th run i get a straight ctd without warning on PRECISELLY jan1, 1420; so god damm annoying o

Hi, thanks for this. I have no idea what it might be, but when I get time I'll try running it. I have never had one on that date myself.

 

[MattyG]

telcemen ai; needs to be toned down in its peace offers; at -50 ws and OFFERING money to it still does not accept; not to mention that no wonder sicilly can NEVER beat it just realized; also keeps 50y old run wars( and a stagnant ai game, etc) untill MAYBE it colapses due to 1500's events

Here's the problem. The ai is NOT very good at almost anything and some game activities are more important than others. In this case, fighting wars and making peace deals. And once Sicily and Tlemscen are at war after 1450, this war is really critical. It isn't just any old war. Plus, the nature of it (the rise of the Mujadidun) means that giving Tlemcen farocity = yes was really important. Otherwise, they might make a worthless peace deal, even if they are ahead.

However, I know the problem with ferocity is that it never gives in, which was partly the point.

So, here's the compromise: I'll still give Tlemcen ferocity, but only for 5 years. Then, if still at war, I'll shift their ai to no longer be ferocious, so they will accept peace deals.

 

[MattyG]

I was playing Tlemscen and when I had the Taifa of Beleares event I chose "We cant do anything" but it didnt release the island. So I looked into the revolt file and discovered that the province of the revolt is 425 and not 821!!!Check it out Matty for the tag BEA.

Dont Forget to delete the persian leaders file
Check out Leon's file, the tag is for Catalyuna you should check the other Iberian files just in case as well!!!
We need a permenant Casus Belli for the Caliphate against Ill-Khanate - Or perhaps giving her a core on Ahwaz and turning the province's culture into Arabic (The dominant culture in Real Life).

I will delete the persian leaders when you send me replacements! (Maybe you have already ....)

Thanks, I'll check out Leon.

I'll give them both a permanent CB.

We can have an event that changes Awhaz to Arabic if under Caliphal control, but cultures don't give CBs, only cores.

Thanks!

 

[unmerged(31994)]

We can have an event that changes Awhaz to Arabic if under Caliphal control, but cultures don't give CBs, only cores.

Thanks!

Awhaz should be arabic, and the Caliphate should have a core on it for posterity's sake.

As for the Persian leaders, there all Safavid leaders in there, and I will have one ready when I finish Egypt's file....

 

[unmerged(15247)]

i guess maybe none annexed(diplo) cordoba and then try to release it? bcouse cordoba can NOT be released once annexed... there are a few more like that; will post when i remember

 

[orimazd]

Speaking of the majors, do you really consider Sicily a major? It almost always gets eaten up before 1500. Replace it with the Ilkhanate. Also, Dichali is not really major material either, since they are too isolated. That's like making Sibir a major, despite the fact that on two sides it is surrounded by colonizable land and is meant to sit there until somebody conquers them, preferably in one fight.

 

[MattyG]

Speaking of the majors, do you really consider Sicily a major? It almost always gets eaten up before 1500. Replace it with the Ilkhanate. Also, Dichali is not really major material either, since they are too isolated. That's like making Sibir a major, despite the fact that on two sides it is surrounded by colonizable land and is meant to sit there until somebody conquers them, preferably in one fight.

I agree that Sicily needs some work, but it is certainly a major power with lots of interesting options and intriguing play. That the ai does not know how to play sea-based powers very well does not mean it isn't a major for player control (SP or MP).

Dichali was put on the selectable list early on as it was one of the first countries to be properly detailed. The list at the top is not necessarily majors, but countries the designers suggest you might like to try.

 

[Dairpo]

just had a cod with the revised 6.33, about 3 game years before the cod i got a message saying leader id 389270 was already in use, and ignored it.. the cod occured close to the civil war in ilkhanate beginning (i took the rebellion path, if that changes things?)

 

[MattyG]

just had a cod with the revised 6.33, about 3 game years before the cod i got a message saying leader id 389270 was already in use, and ignored it.. the cod occured close to the civil war in ilkhanate beginning (i took the rebellion path, if that changes things?)

There was a duplicated between Iran monarchs and Danish leaders. I have resolved this for the next beta, due very very soon. Thanks!

 

[Don_Quigleone]

I've had some replicated leader ID errors, around Zunglis rebbelion I believe, not ctd causing though, just an error box

Edit: a second different leader error as well: Fenruary entered instead of february, this should be asy to find

 

[MattyG]

I've had some replicated leader ID errors, around Zunglis rebbelion I believe, not ctd causing though, just an error box

Edit: a second different leader error as well: Fenruary entered instead of february, this should be asy to find

Thanks, I'll look into both issues.

 

[Don_Quigleone]

There's still replicated monarch/leader ids in ruthenia, here's a number list if it helps:

40165 - 40180 (inclusive)

Also could you add in a choice whether you become ruthenia or not, as cossack hetmenate i wanted to become Ukraine (get's slightly more events) but I was forced to become ruthenia, either the events should be duplicated (or you could use a gate similiar to kalmar events where you have it tied to province, and then stipulate that it only works if the selected nations own that province) or you should add in an action B to the formation of ruthenia event.

 

[MattyG]

There's still replicated monarch/leader ids in ruthenia, here's a number list if it helps:

40165 - 40180 (inclusive)

Also could you add in a choice whether you become ruthenia or not, as cossack hetmenate i wanted to become Ukraine (get's slightly more events) but I was forced to become ruthenia, either the events should be duplicated (or you could use a gate similiar to kalmar events where you have it tied to province, and then stipulate that it only works if the selected nations own that province) or you should add in an action B to the formation of ruthenia event.

What do you consider to be an appropriate action be for this event?

 

[Don_Quigleone]

Leave the mantle on the floor, cossacks care only for themselves ... something like that, of course it might be intentional that no action b is present, but why then put in ukrainian events? of course maybe ruthenia should be able to morph into ukraine as well... or maybe ukraine should be a watered down version of ruthenia? but there should be a choice either way, ideally both paths should be fully fleshed out, after all one of the design principles for interregnum is that the player isn't straight jacketed down one path, I'm just thinking that for the future we should leave it as an option for the player to decide on. heck even in vanilla you didn't have to form russia as muscowy (or whoever) you'd be foolish not too, but it was still the players choice, of course all this really depends on whats planned for the area, but thats my two cents anyway...

 

[MattyG]

There are a couple of things.

First is that the Ruthenia formed by the Cossack Hetmanate is a little different to that formed by Kiev or Halych-Volhynia, with a more Cossacky focus, although there could be more events.

Second is that Ruthenia isn't even a concept beofre it forms, unlike the crown of France or of England. The cossacks themselves (presumably) come up with the idea of creating an overarching state to justify their continued rule opver such a large area.

Third, Ukraine is the alternative already. If you don't form Ruthenia, you can form Ukraine, but not until later.

That all said, I agree that we could have an action_b, I just can't see many players wanting to refuse the chance to get their hands on the cores Ruthenia can get.