Interregnum: Bug Reporting

[MattyG]

Well, the events that form Occitania wake all the appropriate monarchs, but they still shouldn't start ruling until their years come up.

I have checked the file I was sent and its all 'in order' with only the appropriate monarch currently ruling and the correct succession line reading to start when their time comes.

Occitania is only meant to be a maybe country, not a definite. I have been sent other games where it formed and I ahve had it form for me (as ai, I mean).

It doesn't obly form via languedoc, but also as a religious revolter from France and Savoy.

Maybe I should redo languedocs alliances at start? But, I don't want to hedge in the REAL major in that area, Savoy.

 

[unmerged(33565)]

In the notification that you are not playing the ai, you have a copy paste error. In alot (if not almost all) it says :

This event is to mark Ukraine as being player-run. In this way, should the nation become ai-controlled for a period, certain events that would normally happen for the ai, will now not happen for Kurdistan. For multiplayer, this means that you can't expect an easy ride of things if you skip a session, nor come back to find the ai-only events have done strange things with your DP sliders and other settings.

Please note the:

will now not happen for Kurdistan

In the Ukraine file. I have seen this in at least 4 or 5 other files...

 

[MattyG]

In the notification that you are not playing the ai, you have a copy paste error. In alot (if not almost all) it says :

This event is to mark Ukraine as being player-run. In this way, should the nation become ai-controlled for a period, certain events that would normally happen for the ai, will now not happen for Kurdistan. For multiplayer, this means that you can't expect an easy ride of things if you skip a session, nor come back to find the ai-only events have done strange things with your DP sliders and other settings.

Please note the:

will now not happen for Kurdistan

In the Ukraine file. I have seen this in at least 4 or 5 other files...

This one has also been noted above a few times.

All corrected for 6.19.

Thanks.

 

[Imrryran]

I have checked the file I was sent and its all 'in order' with only the appropriate monarch currently ruling and the correct succession line reading to start when their time comes.

You saw the events with every monarch poping up in 1571 ?

 

[Imrryran]

Bushman (in South Africa) is called "teaman", without an upper case t. It appears in colonization panel.

 

[MattyG]

Bushman (in South Africa) is called "teaman", without an upper case t. It appears in colonization panel.

Fixed, thanks.

 

[unmerged(33577)]

When working on Colonial file i found a copy/paste typo

##################
#
#   Georgia Region
#
#   ID Range is 811100 to 811199
#
##################

must be

##################
#
#   Carolina Region
#
#   ID Range is 811100 to 811199
#
##################

and

##################
#
#   Miscellaneous North American Province Claims
#
#   ID Range is 812300 to 812299
#
##################

must be

##################
#
#   Miscellaneous North American Province Claims
#
#   ID Range is 812300 to [B]812399[/B]
#
##################

 

[MattyG]

Thanks, changed.

 

[unmerged(33577)]

Another one in RoTW file :

event 210375 and following have double owned prov. trigger

event = {
     id = 210375 
     random = no
     province = 823 
     trigger = {
             event = 210379 
             NOT = { core = { province = 823 data = -1 } }
             owned = { province = 823 data = -1 }
             [B]owned = { province = 823 data = -1 }[/B]
             continent = europe
     }

 

[MattyG]

The RoTW file has not been updated for Interregnum.

All of those events have lines like that. Even one of the owned = { province = 823 data - -1 } lines is irrelevant, as the event can only happen if you own province 823 because of the line above it (province = 823).

Until we have finalized Africa, there's little point in slaving over that colonial file.

But thanks!

 

[unmerged(31994)]

Ahem - in the Cordoba file, there are 2 culture change events for Valencia! Could you delete the last one?

 

[MattyG]

Ahem - in the Cordoba file, there are 2 culture change events for Valencia! Could you delete the last one?

Will do. For 6.19, planned to be out tonight (depends on Finn )

 

[unmerged(31994)]

You wont believe this!
'The First Malwas Regiments are Formed' event has the last referal to Granada

 

[MattyG]

You wont believe this!
'The First Malwas Regiments are Formed' event has the last referal to Granada

AAaaaaaarrrggghhhhhh.

I quit!!!!
























(No I don't. I'll change it right away.)

 

[unmerged(31994)]

Fixed first event in Mali file - got rid of the defined date and made it more in line with the Morrocan conquest event (that spans up to 1520).

event = {
id = 724010
random = no
country = MAL
trigger = { event = 703020 } #Morocco
name = "The Moroccan Embassy"
desc = "With Timbuktu firmly under the grip of the Sultanate, the Moroccans attempted to project and exert their influence over the rest of the Sahel. The Sultan sent an embassy to Buré demanding that the Musa pay a yearly tribute of around two mithkals of gold."
date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1419 }
offset = 120
deathdate = { day = 30 month = december year = 1515 }

action_a = {
name = "Send back his head (this will mean war)"
command = { type = relation which = MOR value = -150 }
command = { type = trigger which = 703021 }
command = { type = sleepevent which = 724020 }
}
action_b = {
name = "Pay the tribute (and become their vassal)"
command = { type = provincetax which = 1496 value = -2 }
command = { type = breakvassal which = ASH } #just in case
command = { type = breakvassal which = BEN } #just in case
command = { type = trigger which = 703022 }
}
}

Caliphate campaigns against the emirs has a trigger - atwar = no. Unfortunitly, this event is so crucial that if it dosent trigger it guts most of the storyline, perhaps u should get rid of the trigger?
Rebellion of the Turkish guard needs more chaos and change the -3 for revolts into -2.

Golden Horde problems


End of the Religious War in the GH file has a referal to the 'PER' tag, could u delete it?

Sayyid Ahmad and the steppes event dosent make sense, read it and I think youll agree should be deleted!

Why is the Victory of Berke Sebudai random?




Nogai, Kazak, and Songhai nations are possible revolters and always annoying, perhaps we should eliminate them?Especially Songhai which dosent make any sense!

 

[unmerged(31994)]

Yemen is not selectable!

Missing event for Christians to reconvert Katsmonu . Can u create a "Turks of Katsmonu" in the Caliphate file too?

Oi! Your biggest bug yet Matty!

The "Western Provinces" Revolt raises the revoltrisk in the GH to up to 110 %! I think you meant province_revoltrisk but instead wrote revoltrisk.You really should check it, or ur dreams of rebuilding the GH will go down the drain

 

[MattyG]

Yemen is not selectable!

Missing event for Christians to reconvert Katsmonu . Can u create a "Turks of Katsmonu" in the Caliphate file too?

Oi! Your biggest bug yet Matty!

The "Western Provinces" Revolt raises the revoltrisk in the GH to up to 110 %! I think you meant province_revoltrisk but instead wrote revoltrisk.You really should check it, or ur dreams of rebuilding the GH will go down the drain

Yemen now selectable in 6.20

Added the Kastamonu event.

Adjusted the revoltrisk issue. Thanks!

 

[MattyG]

Fixed first event in Mali file - got rid of the defined date and made it more in line with the Morrocan conquest event (that spans up to 1520).

Done.

Caliphate campaigns against the emirs has a trigger - atwar = no. Unfortunitly, this event is so crucial that if it dosent trigger it guts most of the storyline, perhaps u should get rid of the trigger?

Removed.

Rebellion of the Turkish guard needs more chaos and change the -3 for revolts into -2.

Kept two of the -3s as they relate to the earlier -1 removal of 30000 troops. If it all happens only in the capital, then players will simply leave their troops out of Baghdad to avoid losses and problems.

End of the Religious War in the GH file has a referal to the 'PER' tag, could u delete it?

Is there not a chance for a Persian state with that tag? I thought that was one of the plans?

Sayyid Ahmad and the steppes event dosent make sense, read it and I think youll agree should be deleted!

Yes, another of the older events that needs to be swept away. Done.

Why is the Victory of Berke Sebudai random?

Mistake. Fixed.

Nogai, Kazak, and Songhai nations are possible revolters and always annoying, perhaps we should eliminate them?Especially Songhai which dosent make any sense!

Well, I think there is a valid argument for the Golden Horde to have the kind of breakaway khanate successor states as happen in RL. Maybe with different names, more 'generic'. We can work on that in the future. In the meantime I'll remove those from the revolt list.

Thanks,

Matty

 

[unmerged(16159)]

Currently in the revolt.txt file, Leon reads...

LEO = {
date = { year = 1400 }
expirydate = { year = 1500 }
minimum = { 435 }
extra = { 435 433 432 }
capital = 435
group = latin
}

Which implies they create with the capital Leon, but the extras are Leon (again) Galacia and Asturias. Shouldn't one of those be Cantabria (431)?

 

[unmerged(16159)]

From the Revolt file

Cordoba, orthodox?
CRD = {
date = { year = 1400 }
expirydate = { year = 1500 }
minimum = { 439 }
extra = { }
capital = 439
group = orthodox
}

Also, I can't find entries in the Revolt file for Estramadura or Castilla. Is this intended?