Interregnum: Bug Reporting

[MattyG]

Well, I thought it was a presistant problem, bust since you fixed it, im happy

Maybe not fixed, but tightened. Let's see how it plays first .

 

[Imrryran]

Angora is Mutazelite at the beginning.

There is no texts for the event Unhappyness among the peasantry choices.

 

[MattyG]

Thanks again. I'll look into both of these and resolve them. Much appreciated.

 

[MattyG]

Angora is Mutazelite at the beginning.

There is no texts for the event Unhappyness among the peasantry choices.

Angora is not Mutazelite at game start. Karaman must have gotten a heretics random event or something very weird must have happened. It's sunni for me in-game, the province.csv file has it as sunni and the prov_1419 does not redefine it as shiite.

I have added text for the Unhappiness event.

 

[Imrryran]

Concerning Angora, I noticed it by ~1420, playing as Byzantium. Sorry for not being able to be more precise. In any case it is a very minor point.

 

[Onedreamer]

Hi, I'm quite new to the game so I may be doing something wrong, anyways I can't run your mod
I unzipped the 6.10 beta into the main EU2 folder, then launched the .bat file. I choose the country to start with (any) the game loads but at the end crashes... any idea of the reason ?
I have also installed the Independent Europe scenario which is installed in pretty much the same way of your scenario and it works fine

 

[Avernite]

some possibilities I can think of:

You don't have the latest patch. If you don't, install it. If you do have it, continue on.

Something messed up during install (it happens even if you do everything right, sometimes...), in which case you could try a reinstall. Still not working then?

Panic

 

[Onedreamer]

edit: lol, silly me... I had reinstalled and forgot to patch it

 

[Culise]

Minor, but the Brittanian event granting a core on Anglica fires for a different province (366, I think...it's one off for sure). Sure, I just did a retcon and immediately declared war on the Hansa, but you may want to know.

 

[Imrryran]

event = {
	id = 300408
	random = no
	name = "The Engineer of Alexandria"
	desc = "Born in 1585, Sufyan Alwafi [...] the glory of Misr."
	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1622 }
	offset = 6000
	deathdate = { day = 30 month = december year = 1635 }

	action_a = {
		name = "Build the Light House"
		command = { type = cash value = -250 }
		command = { type = revoltrisk which = 60 value = -1 }
		command = { type = infra value = 200 }
		command = { type = trade value = 200 }
		command = { type = vp value = 50 }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "Dont build it..."
		command = { type = infra value = -25 }
	}
}

It lacks a trigger province, cause it fires when I was playing Byzantium, without any land in Egypt.


I (Byzantium) retake Lebanon/Aleppo/Syria/Judea/Samaria from the Caliphate but it keeps the levantine culture. Is that WAD ?


I saw there is an event for Ragusa's cot to disappear if taken by Sicily or Genoa. Why isn't one when conquerd by Byzantium ? It seems strange not to destroy this CoT which is so close of the main one (Thrace or Hellas).

 

[MattyG]

Minor, but the Brittanian event granting a core on Anglica fires for a different province (366, I think...it's one off for sure). Sure, I just did a retcon and immediately declared war on the Hansa, but you may want to know.

Thanks times six!

In checking up that event and finding the trigger error, I found similar ones in related events, so with one bug report I managed to squish six of the little nasties!

Thanks Culise!

 

[Symmetry]

A few things with Britanny

*Event 420029, "Parliment's Declaration of Integrity" which gives Brittany a claim on the Midlands should require events 420025, 420026, 420027, and 420028 I'm assuming, rather than 420025, 420026, 420028, and 420028.

*Why do all the assimilation events give Brittany extra badboy? It seems to me that giving the conquered provinces legal representation would tend to make people more accepting of the conquests. This is sort of implied by the way the assimilation events in Britain give Brittany cores on those provinces, though that could be local recognition rather than international recognition.

*The text of all the assimilation events from France refer to the province of Bristol.

*Event 420200. Text should be "due to programming errors" not "doe to programming errors."

*Event 420641, the establishment of a Brittany CoT due to New World goods, mistakenly refers to the Brittany CoT as in "Ulster."

*I couldn't figure out the difference between events 420669 and 420670.

*Finally, for the Act of Union events for getting anglosaxon culture with a separated parliment, there are seperate conditions for 'stability = 0' and 'stability = 2'.

*Event 420226 never fired for some reason, despite the fact that I was meeting the conditions from about 1455 t0 1520.

*The event for Wessex converting to reform fired before the John Calvin event fired, so nothing happened.

*I think -2 stabilty and +1 innovativeness is a little harsh to have for every single province of yours that converts to protestantism if you choose not to repress them.

 

[MattyG]

Excellent points all.

I add the province = 744 to the Alexandia event.

For the event in which Ragusa can lose a CoT I added something that I thought I had already done, which makes the event trigger if Byzantium owns the province.

I created a new event for the Caliphate titled "The Patriarch Denounces the Caliph and Islam in which it loses syrian (levantine) culture if it loses control of Syria and Aleppo and the owner is not sunni culture and the two provinces are not both sunni culture.

Thanks for all those points.

MattyG

 

[Imrryran]

I created a new event for the Caliphate titled "The Patriarch Denounces the Caliph and Islam in which it loses syrian (levantine) culture if it loses control of Syria and Aleppo and the owner is not sunni culture and the two provinces are not both sunni culture.

Shouldn't you modify the BYZ event "The Patriarch of Antioch" in that way :

# Based on concepts devised by Mad King James
event = {
	id = 201946
	trigger = {
		OR = {
			AND = {
				owned = { province = 485 data = -1 } # Aleppo
				owned = { province = 490 data = -1 } # Syria
			}
			AND = {
				owned = { province = 485 data = -1 } # Aleppo
				owned = { province = 491 data = -1 } # Lebanon
			}
			AND = {
				owned = { province = 490 data = -1 } # Syria
				owned = { province = 491 data = -1 } # Lebanon
			}
		}
	}
	random = no
	country = BYZ
	name = "The Patriarch of Antioch"
	desc = "The Syrian people of Antioch and Tripoli had the distinction of once belonging to the Eastern Roman Empire. In addition to having been citizens, the syrian culture also supported one of the Orthodox Church's most important figures, the Patriarch of Antioch. Just as the subordination of the Patriarchs in Jerusalem, Antioch and Alexandria had once elevated their counterparts in Constantinople and Rome, the recovery of Antioch now gave the Byzantine Empire increased importance in the Christian world. Although it would undoubtedly involve making concessions, winning the support of the Patriarch of Antioch would certainly gain the Empire widespread support in Syria."

	date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1450 }
	offset = 365
	deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1820 }

	action_a = {
		name = "Reinstate the Patriarch"
		command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = 1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = -2 }
		command = { type = add_countryculture which = syrian }
		command = { type = addcore which = 490 }
		command = { type = addcore which = 491 }
[COLOR=Red]		command = { type = trigger which = "The Patriarch Denounces the Caliph and Islam" }[/COLOR]
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "Maintain the supremacy of the Greek Church"
		command = { type = stability value = 3 }
		command = { type = provincetax which = 357 value = 1 }
		command = { type = provincemanpower which = 357 value = 1 }
		command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = 1 }
	}
}

 

[Imrryran]

Attempting to create a leader with a leader-id (30782) which is already used.

 

[MattyG]

Shouldn't you modify the BYZ event "The Patriarch of Antioch" in that way :
QUOTE]

That would be elegant, except that if the Byzantine event triggers first, then the caliphate conquers the provinces necessary to gain Syrian culture, then those provinces are reconquered ... etc etc

In this case, better to have them as separate objects.

 

[MattyG]

Attempting to create a leader with a leader-id (30782) which is already used.

Thanks, I'll look into that one too.

Matty

 

[Imrryran]

My two cents concerning the colonisation :

As usal the player has no problem when he wants to colonise. As Byzantium I took Texas+Louisiane+Mississipi without any difficulty. There was nobody there except natives.

However, IA-played Hanseatic League can't manage to colonise the USA (or the place they were in real history). It doesn't seem able to win over the haudenosse (or whatever it's spelled) and to efficiently explore the coast. Eire did better in Canada, probably because the area is empty and it began the exploration before the League.

I think IA-played League should be tweaked to be more efficient, maybe with some explorers or conquistadors. In Caribbean it successfully colonise some islands.

South America is a mess, with mayas, bavarian, irish, zapotec (after a war I guess) , genoese and hanseatic having colonise some provinces along the brasilian coast. Is this intended ? Or should some "blocks" appear ?

In addition to that, in 1750 California is empty. Which nation has it as a goal in its AI file ?

 

[unmerged(55521)]

My two cents concerning the colonisation :

As usal the player has no problem when he wants to colonise. As Byzantium I took Texas+Louisiane+Mississipi without any difficulty. There was nobody there except natives.

However, IA-played Hanseatic League can't manage to colonise the USA (or the place they were in real history). It doesn't seem able to win over the haudenosse (or whatever it's spelled) and to efficiently explore the coast. Eire did better in Canada, probably because the area is empty and it began the exploration before the League.

I think IA-played League should be tweaked to be more efficient, maybe with some explorers or conquistadors. In Caribbean it successfully colonise some islands.

South America is a mess, with mayas, bavarian, irish, zapotec (after a war I guess) , genoese and hanseatic having colonise some provinces along the brasilian coast. Is this intended ? Or should some "blocks" appear ?

In addition to that, in 1750 California is empty. Which nation has it as a goal in its AI file ?

My advise about colonisation was: let some noneuropean countries do the job for dirty poor or far provs so at 1820 coastline would be colonised.
Muslim Inca would do it to argentina and patagonia poor grain/fish/wool provs.
Ternate (pagan/hindu/catholic/reformed/muslim) could do it to Australia and New Zealand. Japan could do it to Far East and Camchatka or west coast of Namerika...
As in game there is no portugal or especialy Spain, there can be some problems in filling space...

 

[unmerged(36826)]

2 Wessex related bugs:

They are not selectable from the start, PUR is not in the list
The event "ailing of the duke" should probably give a minus in military value rather than in diplomacy and administration.