I several games where I was playing England I have inherited the crown of Navarra when the current king died without an heir. Some questions about this:
1.) Is it necessary to vassalize the country in question? I beleive it is.
2.) Is the death without and heir event scripted as an historical event? I get the impression that it is, at least in the case of Navarra.
3.) Is it possible to inherit a minor country which historicly had no king? Venice or the Hanse would be historical examples. Do all countries have kings in this game, regardless of history?
By the way, if you can inherit Navarra in this manner, it makes a very handy base for expansion into Spain and southern France.
In another game, again playing as England, I managed to vassalize Saxony. Saxony itself had previously vassilized Wittemburg.
1.) Is the vassal of a vassal also the vassal of the primary vassalizing nation (England in this case)? Does England get any benefit from the income of the sub-vassal (Wittemburg in this case)?
2.) Is it impossible to annex a country which itself has vassals? I found this to be the case with Saxony. All other factors were in place (common religion, common border, vassalization,190+ relations). But Saxony refused annexation where other larger states (Brandenburg, Bohemia) fell like dominos.
1.) Is it necessary to vassalize the country in question? I beleive it is.
2.) Is the death without and heir event scripted as an historical event? I get the impression that it is, at least in the case of Navarra.
3.) Is it possible to inherit a minor country which historicly had no king? Venice or the Hanse would be historical examples. Do all countries have kings in this game, regardless of history?
By the way, if you can inherit Navarra in this manner, it makes a very handy base for expansion into Spain and southern France.
In another game, again playing as England, I managed to vassalize Saxony. Saxony itself had previously vassilized Wittemburg.
1.) Is the vassal of a vassal also the vassal of the primary vassalizing nation (England in this case)? Does England get any benefit from the income of the sub-vassal (Wittemburg in this case)?
2.) Is it impossible to annex a country which itself has vassals? I found this to be the case with Saxony. All other factors were in place (common religion, common border, vassalization,190+ relations). But Saxony refused annexation where other larger states (Brandenburg, Bohemia) fell like dominos.