The increase in IC due to infrastructure is negligible compared to the increase due to adding a factory. The formula is
IC=F*(1+F/100)*(0.7+3I/10)
I put this into an Excel spreadsheet and found that even an increase in infrastructure from 40% to 100% increases the IC less than adding a factory, for any initial number of factories.
So the rule is if you have a choice between adding infrastructure or a factory, ALWAYS ADD A FACTORY unless factories are maxed out.
As a rule of thumb, adding a factory always adds about one IC, whereas adding 10% infrastructure adds about 0.2 IC, so it takes a lot of infrastructure to make a significant difference in IC.
Of course there are other factors influencing IC (such as ministers), and there are other good reasons to increase infrastructure (such as transport capacity). So another general rule of play is for a 1936 or other early scenario with a country like Germany, build factories like hell at the start, and worry about infrastructure later when you need it.
Henri
IC=F*(1+F/100)*(0.7+3I/10)
I put this into an Excel spreadsheet and found that even an increase in infrastructure from 40% to 100% increases the IC less than adding a factory, for any initial number of factories.
So the rule is if you have a choice between adding infrastructure or a factory, ALWAYS ADD A FACTORY unless factories are maxed out.
As a rule of thumb, adding a factory always adds about one IC, whereas adding 10% infrastructure adds about 0.2 IC, so it takes a lot of infrastructure to make a significant difference in IC.
Of course there are other factors influencing IC (such as ministers), and there are other good reasons to increase infrastructure (such as transport capacity). So another general rule of play is for a 1936 or other early scenario with a country like Germany, build factories like hell at the start, and worry about infrastructure later when you need it.
Henri