Info about the Sumerian pictograph writing system?

  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Kyriakos

Writer
May 21, 2010
606
45
One some other site i was shown the following image, about those pictographs:

Sumerian_Numbers.jpg


I would like to ask if anyone knows how correct that is as a deciphering of the numbers in the images, and also if you can direct to more info on the numbering system those people used :)

I am mostly interested due to (as far as i know) the mesopotamians first setting 360 as the degrees to be counted in a circle, and am trying to find why they used that number.
Also the so-called Vedic circles tie to 360 as well (and any other number perfectly divided by 9), through their 9 segments (ie in parts of 40 degrees).

9-12-circle-CardPoints.jpg
 

Gordy

Ex-Senior Full Chairman of the Pedantry Commitee
1 Badges
Dec 16, 2003
2.863
1.912
  • Pillars of Eternity
As I understand it, the 360 degree system was based on the base-60 system of Babylonians (itself a compromise between a base-6 and a base-10 system).

edit: now that I look at your piccy again, my point seems to have been suggested in the diagram.
 

Kyriakos

Writer
May 21, 2010
606
45
I already knew all that. You are not helpful :p

;)

60 is argued to have been a main possibility due to easy (perfect) division by the first 6 integers anyway, but already that would install 10 there.

I am mostly wondering if anything is known for a non-practical basis for choosing 360 as the number of degrees.
 

Amallric

Field Marshal
4 Badges
May 18, 2008
4.423
267
  • Arsenal of Democracy
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • 500k Club
One thing that comes to mind is the duration of the year. 10 is useful for arithmethics(mostly with arab numeral though), but 12/60/360 is better for astronomy.
 

Kyriakos

Writer
May 21, 2010
606
45
Thanks again... It seems it is a rather obscure point. Afaik the entire work on (supposed or not) Sumerian math is sort of guess-work. :\
At any rate, if one goes by the Greek view of that since the 7th century BC (Thales/Anaximander) it seems that mesopotamian math was not theorem-based, and they likely did not have theorems as part of it at all (but used math in a more practical way through trial and error).