is it just crazy old me, or does the 1939 thing under the infantry div pictures look a little out of place? i know we can prolly change it in ms paint or something, but im just saying. i dont know, but i would like to chaneg it to the whole roman numeral model thing that the other units get. and maybe also change the model name from infantry '00 to maybe pre-war infantry or infantry level x.
somehow the whole year = model sophistication makes the game a little too... adherent to actual history. it introduces a kind of reference to actual history in unit development that i find a little... whats the word, unwelcome? to me its kind of like telling the player where they should be in tech development
again, i know we might be able to change these in the game files, but assuming that it goes [1937 1939 1941 1943 1945 1947], i dont know how you could set up a non year based naming system for all the models.
my idea was, as i mentioned above, pre-war infantry, basic early-war infantry, improved early war-infantry, maybe also continuing this by saying basic late war infantry, improved late war, and advanced late war? these would all go from I to VI in the unit icon of course
id appreciate any response on this topic from you guys
somehow the whole year = model sophistication makes the game a little too... adherent to actual history. it introduces a kind of reference to actual history in unit development that i find a little... whats the word, unwelcome? to me its kind of like telling the player where they should be in tech development
again, i know we might be able to change these in the game files, but assuming that it goes [1937 1939 1941 1943 1945 1947], i dont know how you could set up a non year based naming system for all the models.
my idea was, as i mentioned above, pre-war infantry, basic early-war infantry, improved early war-infantry, maybe also continuing this by saying basic late war infantry, improved late war, and advanced late war? these would all go from I to VI in the unit icon of course
id appreciate any response on this topic from you guys