I've noticed that the Indian trade nodes retain the vast majority of their value, and that the value of the Aden, Alexandria, and Basra trade nodes comes mostly from provinces in those nodes. Shouldn't it be the case, for example, that the Aden node draws most of its value from the Indian nodes, and Alexandria from the Aden node (indirectly from India)? If the Arabian (and European) countries had a major advantage over the Indian ones in trade power in the Indian nodes, this would be the case, but it currently doesn't happen. I think it would be more accurate if the Indian trade nodes had massive value, but great difficulty in retaining that value vs. Arab and European traders. Thoughts?