• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

mattkunz

Major
54 Badges
Apr 15, 2012
570
248
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Rome: Vae Victis
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Imperator: Rome
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Fury
  • Europa Universalis IV: Golden Century
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Imperator: Rome Sign Up
  • Imperator: Rome - Magna Graecia
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Cities: Skylines - Mass Transit
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Stellaris Sign-up
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Pride of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • 500k Club
  • Victoria 2
  • Europa Universalis IV
I have a small suggestion, that I think would increase the immersion value of increasing development. It would be fun, if provinces in rich trade nodes got a discount on the cost of increasing development.
I think this would incentivize spreading development in a more historically immersive way, i.e. you have an incentive to concentrate development in the economic heart of your empire. It may be tricky to balance, because increasing development also increases the wealth of a provinces node (increased production and trade power) and we don't want that to go rampant, but it doesn't have to be linear.
 
Upvote 0