comagoosie said:
IIRC Only colonial rebels create cores, though patriots might make cores for they country if its the same culture.
In Nomine - What does the Betas Think ? (comments thread)
- Thread starter unmerged(1823)
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
IIRC Only colonial rebels create cores, though patriots might make cores for they country if its the same culture.
I wonder what date they shall choose as the start of said scenario - there are several to choose from. 
So, for example, would that mean that if we get Scots separatist rebels appear in Northumberland, they could give Scotland a core on the province? I mean, going by the game system, that should work, right?Markusw7 said:
By the same rule, Canadians in America, or Dutch rebels pouring over the border into the Spanish Netherlands, and giving themselves a core on Flanders, &c.
Looks fantastic! Cannot wait! However, I still want to now if my moarchs will last longer then 33 seconds in IN?
Woad-Warrier said:Perhaps my signature should be:
ENGLAND CONFIDES THAT EVERYMAN SHALL DO HIS DUTY
And win the Hundred Years' War Scenario in In Nomine
And what is considered victory? A force PU or union of crowns wil be impossible, so is a victory a vasselisation? or straight up annexation!
That was one of the most annoying problems, especially first monarch. For example Mehmed II came on throne in 1451, and game start at 1453, so is logical to live for good 15-20 years more... But seems like NA monarch system take all starting monarch as 70years old so they all die fast, so Mehmed II too. From several games I played with OE, he never reached 1460 year... Anyway monarch in overall should live longer, so we will have more rare PU and RC...Gigalocus said:
Keep taking land until you can vassalize them. I honestly doubt you'd be able to force a union.
And then annex, of course.
And then annex, of course.
ZmajOgnjeniVuk said:Maintaining the Status Quo would be a great victory for England.
If France is the same as Vanilla (Mega manpwoer, mega armies, mega chash) then the war will be a real struggle, I am determined to win it (And use longbow infantry, even if they're just as bad as they are in Vanilla, and the French men at arms are supieror.
Gigalocus said:
Those are my fears also.
And we don't have the benefit of desicive battles (unless you can recruit a 6 shock general before you start the war..
).
Woad-Warrier said:Those are my fears also. And we don't have the benefit of desicive battles (unless you can recruit a 6 shock general before you start the war..
Just use Henry V
well, if he lasts longer then 12 seconds.
Gigalocus said:Just use Henry V
Unless his classed as a general like Napoleon was in NA, then he'll die exceedingly fast.
Or they could/should have HYW as a succession war (which it was!), in which case you could force a union.
mandead said:Or they could/should have HYW as a succession war (which it was!), in which case you could force a union.
Honestly doubt they have. But it'd be awesome if it were possible, only about a 40 percent warscore too.
mandead said:Or they could/should have HYW as a succession war (which it was!), in which case you could force a union.
But then it would have to be an England-French alliance against another nation.
Remember that the AI values War Capacity, not War Score.Woad-Warrier said:Honestly doubt they have. But it'd be awesome if it were possible, only about a 40 percent warscore too.
ZmajOgnjeniVuk said:Remember that the AI values War Capacity, not War Score.
If you've got a 40 percent warscore as England then you must be doing something right.
Cheating?Woad-Warrier said:If you've got a 40 percent warscore as England then you must be doing something right.