• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

TheMeInTeam

Field Marshal
54 Badges
Dec 27, 2013
30.274
18.949
  • Age of Wonders III
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Hearts of Iron IV: No Step Back
  • Stellaris
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Crusader Kings II: Monks and Mystics
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Battle for Bosporus
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Fury
  • Europa Universalis IV: Golden Century
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Prison Architect
  • Hearts of Iron IV: La Resistance
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Magicka 2
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Victoria 2
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Magicka
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
There is no rule set under which "two armies on the same side of a war in the same province can't travel to the same provinces" becomes acceptable.

ZoC can't be intuitive as long as that's true, it becomes error-prone with merging armies, and worst of all it violates the concept of ZoC in the first place. Those people are in the same province for all intents and purposes in the game. ZoC isn't the same thing conceptually as a magnetic field, nor does it have to be. There are implementations whereby forts can block passage without violating this concept, including some already proposed.

As such, you have not actually removed carpet sieging.

The current patch hasn't done so either. It's still optimal (and frequently possible) to restrict construction of units and occupy provinces with 1 stacks. If anything, the micromanagement burden increases, since you have to be much faster-reacting to stop those suicide 1 stacks trying to unsiege provinces, creating far more point-and-click than the situation where you'd just leave 1-3 guys there until they got it. There are exceptions of course (holy war --> win battles and take 1 fort), but it's hard to say that we're actually in less micro overall on average.
 
  • 2
Reactions:

seriousgigi

Colonel
2 Badges
Sep 8, 2013
999
1.146
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Crusader Kings II
I blame that fort to the north you're besieging (the one with 0%). The 31.4k army must have come from Smolensk so they're under the northern fort's ZoC, while the 55.5k ones must have come from Bryansk.

Yeah, we need the UI to tell us this. It's frustrating.


yes you are right but it is still pointless you know they are both in same place i mean shoulder to shoulder but they can't manage to go somewhere on the same road :S
 

FrigidSoul

Major
55 Badges
Jun 7, 2009
568
764
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Colonel
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Tyranny: Archon Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Europa Universalis IV: Third Rome
  • Age of Wonders III
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Shadowrun Returns
  • Shadowrun: Dragonfall
  • Shadowrun: Hong Kong
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Europa Universalis IV: Golden Century
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Age of Wonders: Planetfall
  • Age of Wonders: Planetfall Deluxe edition
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Stellaris
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Sword of the Stars
  • 500k Club
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Europa Universalis IV: Pre-order
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
The current patch hasn't done so either. It's still optimal (and frequently possible) to restrict construction of units and occupy provinces with 1 stacks. If anything, the micromanagement burden increases, since you have to be much faster-reacting to stop those suicide 1 stacks trying to unsiege provinces, creating far more point-and-click than the situation where you'd just leave 1-3 guys there until they got it. There are exceptions of course (holy war --> win battles and take 1 fort), but it's hard to say that we're actually in less micro overall on average.

Yep, I'd kill for an "autonomous 1-stack nuisance suppression" button.