where did you get that forum avatar?hopefully it works better than HoI4 armies
Imperator Development Diary - 8th of April
- Thread starter Trin Tragula
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
@Trin Tragula
Are you going to at least consider porting this delegating control to generals system back to other PDX games? Such as say EU4 (currently it is per-tag not per armies and has issues of it's own), CK 2, and *cough* VictoriaII III?
Are you going to at least consider porting this delegating control to generals system back to other PDX games? Such as say EU4 (currently it is per-tag not per armies and has issues of it's own), CK 2, and *cough* Victoria
There has been a thread talking about this for a long time now called "Trucebreaking, constant war and manpower" but it's kind of dead now anyways many ideas on how to fix truce braking have been talked about there, I'm also fairly sure I read somewhere that they will probably be changing it in some way and if they do that we won't be seeing it in the dev clash since the game is so close to release.
Last edited:
This set comes with registering purchased For the Glory, a EU2-based game.
Those areas had sparse population and lacked significant settlements, even in medieval times.
Heck, I can show you some areas in modern day Serbia that are dotted only by villages and very few 10k towns.
Even those are only existing due to deforestation. Proper roads and tunnels certainly helped.
So, I'd say this decision makes sense.
Hello , I am a bit concerned about the Etruscan region , I haven't inspected others but by what I see the names seem a little bit off , Can I ask on what was based the research upon?
For example in the map above I see two times Sena, but Sena was founded by Romans in 30 AD and didn't exhist at the time, then the region Called Velcal in the map was Called Velzna in Etruscan, then Clausi ( Clavsium in latin ) was Called Clevsin in Etruscan , Tarchuna was Tarknal ( As pronounced ) different from Tarchna , another city in Etruscan also called Anxur in Volscian, then there are others but I will stop here ...
Any explanation on that ? Also will you characterize the Etrurian culture differently from Hellenic? Because they had a different pantheon , language and culture and are as unique as would be Celts .
For example in the map above I see two times Sena, but Sena was founded by Romans in 30 AD and didn't exhist at the time, then the region Called Velcal in the map was Called Velzna in Etruscan, then Clausi ( Clavsium in latin ) was Called Clevsin in Etruscan , Tarchuna was Tarknal ( As pronounced ) different from Tarchna , another city in Etruscan also called Anxur in Volscian, then there are others but I will stop here ...
Any explanation on that ? Also will you characterize the Etrurian culture differently from Hellenic? Because they had a different pantheon , language and culture and are as unique as would be Celts .
Additionally the western Balkans have a lot of mountains which were unpassable, especially in antiquity.
I think I going to learn how to mod more than just events in CK2, this is a realy nice addition.
To further extrapolate, it would be prudent as the game gets further developed that religious pantheons should be organised along the lines of religion groups, to highlight the various and quite unique indiosyncracies among what would otherwise be described as rather heterogeneous pantheons.
The Romans for example worshipped gods unique to them such as Janus, Quirinus (who was supposedly Sabine in origin), Dīs Pater, Liber and the Etruscan Orcus. None of these figures had any Greek equivalents (with the exclusion of Liber whose identity would eventually blend with that of Bacchus/Dionysus).
Last edited:
I like the objective system, a lot of times in my games during the years I say to myself: "Damn, I'm the ruler why I have to move every single soldier in three different fronts without the possibility to delegate?"
you just reminded me of the magnificent wall calendar that was in the forum in the series. how cool (probably useless too, but super cool nevertheless) would be to have the date in the game indicating idus and calendas as reference for days of the month.
I know, completely unnecessary, but that is totally not the point
Oh, stop dithering and publish the game already. I'm bored of EU4 after 40,000 hours on the game or something; CK2 went loopy about two years ago; and HOI4 is about as attractive as a coal mine.
While true, programming it to work properly is another matter... HoI4 is good example of failure... so far. The only game that comes to mind where it worked is Majesty, but it's the main feature of the game and has its flaws.
A difficult task, but, still, it deserve to be reach with trial and error, game by game.
Devs, I found a grammar error in one of the let's plays.
You should write "Led by". It's pronounced the same as the element Pb (lead). But past tense of the verb lead is spelled "led".
You should write "Led by". It's pronounced the same as the element Pb (lead). But past tense of the verb lead is spelled "led".
Great, now I can't unsee this. I hope they'll fix this soon, or it'll be really annoying.
Did anyone else notice that there appear to be cities on the map in the uncolonized parts of Dacia? It looks quite odd.
Wow. This is aweaome. Auromated armies is something we would need in all strategy games. Thank you guys.
There are still people and pops in this provinces. They are just not organized into a state or organized tribe.