Eastern Bengal remained relatively underpopulated up to the Delhi Sultanate and the Mughals.Is there a reason that the most eastern parts of Bengal are uncolonised? Seems a bit weird given how it's a very fertile and densely populated area, though I don't really know much about Indian history, so perhaps things were vastly different there in the past.
You should make the no great power alliances not effect player to player alliances. Sometimes you just want to paint the world two colours with your co-op partner and I would hate to see something like this get in the way.
Interesting. Any reason why this was the case given the fertility of the area.Eastern Bengal remained relatively underpopulated up to the Delhi Sultanate and the Mughals.
It's an island in CK2 too I think. So I assume it probably changed around the same time the bridge to ceylon broke.That's interesting, I didn't know Kutch was an island back then. Does anyone know when it got connected to the mainland?
It's an island in CK2 too I think. So I assume it probably changed around the same time the bridge to ceylon broke.
well , 25 April have to come faster ..... i cant wait anymore
so the strategy is having 499, high pop and give the new conquered lands to vassals?
It's an island in CK2 too I think. So I assume it probably changed around the same time the bridge to ceylon broke.