Maybe I've been playing too much EU4 where it caps at +25 or -25%, but does it not stop at some value?
No. Ticking warscore never stops...
- 1
Maybe I've been playing too much EU4 where it caps at +25 or -25%, but does it not stop at some value?
No. Ticking warscore never stops...
could easily be replaced with Ted Cruz, Rick Perry, or Romney and have the same end result
Only if, while trying to convert a county, his court chaplain discovers the FLDS heresy and Romney converts. Then we would also lose the minimum age requirement for women (or, rather, girls now).Ehhhhh not quite, maybe if Romney became President, he official religion of the US would change to Mormonism, which allows polygamy![]()
wait, there is a differnce between wars in the 18th century and wars in the middle ages
Declared war over colony, burnt your homeland to the ground, obliterated your army, sacked you capital, slaughtered your family, carpet sieged your allies.....lost the war for not occupying a single island.
Also its possible to win from warscore alone after 36 months not decades. Ticking War Score caps at 99% without any major battles until month 36. With major battles plus war score it can happen much sooner.That's how I've seen the AI lose plenty of crusades/jihads.
Utterly crush all the defenidng armies, start seiging. Defender raises tiny 200 man stacks that just replenished. Attacker sends all 30k troops to chace after tiny stack.
Repeat forever. No land is ever taken, thus defender war score ticks up to 100%, even if it started as 80% in favor of the attackers.
Fortunatly all that ticking warscore resets as soon as a single county within the target is taken, so it's not to bad in smaller wars.
Scores tick as follows: Defender gains ticks if defender holds ALL lands within the target. Attacker gains ticks if attacker holds ALL lands within the target.
Exception is declaring independance. Than, the attacker gains ticking warscore for holding all his lands (because it's the defender/former leige that has to defend is old lands). So the example of America is actually wrong. If you declare independance, you don't need to occupy lands off your former leige
ThException is declaring independance. Than, the attacker gains ticking warscore for holding all his lands (because it's the defender/former leige that has to defend is old lands). So the example of America is actually wrong. If you declare independance, you don't need to occupy lands off your former leige
3 years surely not 3 decades? Though Washington's battle war score would make it even sooner.Yeah thats why I made the comment about how Washington could just wait 3 decades for it to tick.
But if it was like CK2 you always can cheat and kill all the abbasids xD
I've seen war score tick past 100%, because of an unsieged trade post. Other side had 100% in battles and around 80-90% in occupation (from other land), but because that trade post was the war goal, that side couldn't win.Maybe I've been playing too much EU4 where it caps at +25 or -25%, but does it not stop at some value?
3 years surely not 3 decades? Though Washington's battle war score would make it even sooner.