I shouldn't need to say anything about this bug...

[scaper12123]

I'll let y'all figure it out. How did this slip past Q/A? XD

EDIT: so a friend of mine did some digging and found this.

Whelp, i'm glad it wasn't unnoticed! But i'm very disappointed in the guy who let this TODO slip past them during the code review before this was pushed.

 

[Beyond Disbelief]

I'll let y'all figure it out. How did this slip past Q/A? XD

1) Easily. The mouse-over details is an existing system with high probability to not be included in the test tasks, whose priority would be on the new systems. Also, internal QA is not what it once was in the 90's because of how massive games have become (not to mention PC QA budget were never as high as Console QA due to lack of critical need.)

2) This should be posted on the bug forum.

 

[scaper12123]

1) Easily. The mouse-over details is an existing system with high probability to not be included in the test tasks, whose priority would be on the new systems. Also, internal QA is not what it once was in the 90's because of how massive games have become (not to mention PC QA budget were never as high as Console QA due to lack of critical need.)

2) This should be posted on the bug forum.

I already posted it on the bug forums. I just wanted to post it on the main page too because... look, they were stripping out all of the rare resources. There was FOUR nanite resources they had to get rid of. How, in the process of getting rid of all of those, did they not think to look at the Dessanu and go "Oh, huh. They explicitly give you these resources. We should change that." I'm honestly thankful it didn't cause a CTD

 

[Sirbab]

I already posted it on the bug forums. I just wanted to post it on the main page too because... look, they were stripping out all of the rare resources. There was FOUR nanite resources they had to get rid of. How, in the process of getting rid of all of those, did they not think to look at the Dessanu and go "Oh, huh. They explicitly give you these resources. We should change that." I'm honestly thankful it didn't cause a CTD

I encountered this earlier and reported, I investigated the code and saw it was commented out with todo written under it. I was sad to find that out. It should at least give nantes in my opinion.

 

[scaper12123]

I encountered this earlier and reported, I investigated the code and saw it was commented out with todo written under it. I was sad to find that out. It should at least give nantes in my opinion.

Just found it and edited the post. xD