For example ?Wow so inaccurate, this was a time of huge advancements in science, astronomy, philosophy, culture, religion etc
For example ?Wow so inaccurate, this was a time of huge advancements in science, astronomy, philosophy, culture, religion etc
I kind of agree but I also don't think you should be actively able to research technology. Essentially you don't get a research budget, technologies arise over time arbitrarily based on several factors (eg. how wealthy your empire is, how big your biggest cities are, how many wealthy elites you have) so if you have a poor empire with few big cities and few aristocrats they won't develop technology as fast since you don't have many people who can afford to spend their time thinking about the nature of the world and how to improve existing technologies. On the other hand Rome for example would advance pretty fast between its big cities, wealth, and number of rich men able to focus on tasks beyond managing peasant farmers.Where the techs you're getting aren't really techs but institutions and everything is an incremental linear modifier.
For example ?
Just Google isn't much of an answer.Just google brings lots of info, for example
http://www.greek-thesaurus.gr/hellenistic-age-science.html
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hellenistic_period
Note the antikitera analog computer
So actually name some, from this specific period, not pre-existing knowledge or knowledge gained later.astronomy was used for time recording, travelling, seafaring, trading, etc
Geography same
Then there are lots of practical discoveries, mathematics and geometry for engineering purposes, medicine for health and workers improvements, etc
For sure there was more science and discoveries in this period than any period after it until maybe the Islamic golden age or the reinassance
So actually name some, from this specific period, not pre-existing knowledge or knowledge gained later.
Similarly, what specific engineering developments can you identify specific to this period from 303 BC to 33 BC ?
I read in some interview, I have to search it, that research works similiar to stellaris and EU:R. So you have inventions which are to a certain degree random and you have to choose one if they appear.
That's disappointing to me. I don't really like the random tech in Stellaris. I much prefer tech trees like in Hearts of Iron.
I suppose there is an advantage in that the randomness helps prevent the situation where you have "solved" the tech tree and it becomes routine... but still, I'm not a big fan of random.