I have no qualms using Steam. As long as Valve continues to deliver a superior product over its competitors, I say good for them.
- 7
- 1
I'm baffled that any gamers who were around before Steam would want to go back to those days. It makes finding, purchasing, installing, and updating games ridiculously convenient.
What this guy said.Dealing with CD codes written in some note book you lost 3 years ago and scratched CD's and all that nonsense is something I never, ever want to return to.
Oh no, a safe way to have games for life where you can also get them pretty cheap when on a special, how absolutely horrific.
Dealing with CD codes written in some note book you lost 3 years ago and scratched CD's and all that nonsense is something I never, ever want to return to.
Do we really own anything? Is reality even real? If a tree falls in the forest...Yeah, just as a heads-up, we don't own our games, Steam does.
Yeah, just as a heads-up, we don't own our games, Steam does.
Same here, the only objection I could think of against Steam (that their publishing system sometimes let obvious scam games through) was squashed when they introduced refunds as well.If i can buy it on steam, that's where I'm getting it. They never did wrong by me, I have games that I forgot I bought in my library that I can spontaneously play for nostalgia, it does achievements, and makes getting discounted games great. I also use some thirdparty websites that sell steamcodes at extremely reduced prices if a game isn't on sale via steam directly, and never had any issue with that. Also makes chatting with friends and hopping into games with them easy.
Without steam I'd probably have a much worse gaming experience.
I'm baffled that any gamers who were around before Steam would want to go back to those days. It makes finding, purchasing, installing, and updating games ridiculously convenient.
It seems like a lot of the dislike for steam is concern for what would happen if it fell into the wrong hands, rather than what it presently is and does.
The percentage indeed wasn't too large; though until CKII really took off on steam about half a year after release it must have been quite a bit larger. Anyway I was really negative about steam and didn't get it until the day before EU4 released (I had preordered); and I only got it because of EU4. At that time I don't think any other company than PI could have got me onto steam. I am still not too happy with them, but I can live with them. (Though if they actually are disabling the GG steam codes for CKII which it appears then I will get a much more negative view of them, since that potentially could cost me hundreds of €.)That almost nobody bought.
Free copies which it now appears steam are disabling...Yet this was changed later where free copies were given to steam.
Complete nonsense. Steam doesn't own the game, Paradox does. We merely buy ONE ticket to be allowed to use their game, and they even permit us to mod it. Steam is the means through which Paradox gives us access to THEIR games, their property.Yeah, just as a heads-up, we don't own our games, Steam does.
These are not problems I have, even though my internet is less than stellar. Switching to offline mode always works fine for me, my only problem with Steam's offline mode is that you typically need to pre-plan it. It doesn't always allow you to start it in offline mode without having first logged in online and then telling it to restart in offline, which can be quite frustrating if you've lost internet unexpectedly and it decides that today is not a day it will work. A few years back it would never work unless you had logged in and restarted it in offline mode, which practically made it useless. Games with patches waiting generally work fine, games that have half patched though, you're usually stuck waiting for it to finish.Eh, this thread is just going to get closed like every other thread discussing Steam (it's fair enough it shouldn't be in this forum, though), but I find Steam ridiculously inconvenient because I am not blessed with high-speed internet and unlimited bandwidth.
Steam will not launch any game that it finds requires a patch (you can launch paradox games from their exe without Steam and bypass this, but that is not the norm and no credit to Steam in any case). With Origin (gasp!), it is at least possible to go offline and then use the game without it having to patch first. Not so with Steam. This is not convenient when you are stuck with awful speed internet and 8GB a month bandwidth; rather the opposite in fact. Many of Steam's other features also do not work without good internet (their much-vaunted Workshop has not worked properly for me ever since I moved; it just downloads the mod partially and puts it in a different directory without the file required for the game to recognise it). This is a widespread enough problem that there is now a site for directly downloading files off the Steam workshop, since it so often messes up (and needs you to use their cloud features to work properly in any case).
Digital downloads are great, but they also existed before Steam. I buy nothing off Steam unless there is no other option. Unfortunately, "no other option" is frequently the case, though that is actually getting less true as GOG continues to be a growing concern. If they continue to rise in market share, it may make economic sense for Paradox down the line to offer DRM-free versions of their games once again, and then both the enthusiastic Steam users and those who dislike it or simply prefer DRM-free can both have what they want.
Well, it will work, but not "perfectly". You will encounter some anomalies if you play without Steam. And you eventually seem to lose access to your DLCs if you don't check in with Steam, periodically.You don't even need to move the game to play without Steam, just running the eu4.exe file directly works perfectly.