• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

UniversalWolf

Quasi-Teetotaler
10 Badges
Jan 13, 2004
1.037
3
  • Deus Vult
  • East India Company Collection
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis III: Chronicles
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Rome Gold
  • Sword of the Stars
  • 500k Club
  • Mount & Blade: Warband
The thing that bugges me the most is that Greek phalanxes and Roman legionaries are all put under heavy infantry. I'd rather see them seperated under different development paths, quite like different doctrine paths are represented in HOI.

I can see why you would say this, but I think that's something better handled via inventions or doctrine choices. Legionaries and phalanx are both clearly "heavy infantry." The differences are in specific equipment and tactics.

About archers, slingers, and skirmishers: I think one of the reasons I wanted them to be separate units is that specific areas were famous for specific types of units. For example, Rhodian and Balearic slingers, Cretan and Scythian archers, and Thracian peltasts. It seems to me the whole concept of trading a certain good to an area in order to make a troop type available needs rethinking.

Also - not to get into naval units too deeply, since that's a Pandora's box of its own - I was reading about the ships used by the Gauls of the channel coast. They used big, oak-wood ships with leather sails suitable for the weather of the Atlantic coast and the North Sea - very different from galleys and trading ships used in the Mediterranean.