I use one general peer unit just to get experience, and however i do it i found it not realistic.
I think that a Mj Gen. commanding one unit should gain normal experience but a Lt Gen only should get 1/3, a Gen should get 1/9 and a FM should get 1/12.
when commanding more units say a Gen commanding 9 units, he should gain experience at normal rate (faster than now), like a Mj general commanding one.
That way in a situation in which you would have 3 units, you would choose to select a Lt General for them, insted three, one peer unit, becuase that single good general would gain the same experience points as the sum of the three.
This aspect also coincides with reality, a FM should gain real experience commanding big numbers of units, not just one.
A FM commanding 12 units should gain experience much faster than now, since you will have really few, and using the techinque of dividing the armies in 12 generals should give them very little to each.
I think that a Mj Gen. commanding one unit should gain normal experience but a Lt Gen only should get 1/3, a Gen should get 1/9 and a FM should get 1/12.
when commanding more units say a Gen commanding 9 units, he should gain experience at normal rate (faster than now), like a Mj general commanding one.
That way in a situation in which you would have 3 units, you would choose to select a Lt General for them, insted three, one peer unit, becuase that single good general would gain the same experience points as the sum of the three.
This aspect also coincides with reality, a FM should gain real experience commanding big numbers of units, not just one.
A FM commanding 12 units should gain experience much faster than now, since you will have really few, and using the techinque of dividing the armies in 12 generals should give them very little to each.
Upvote
0