I agree with 95% of what you said. But the "cosmetic" issue is a serious one. True game mechanics is priority, but textures is also very important. The point to building a city is to gaze at what we built and immerse ourselves in the details. Like stones in rivers, the grungy look of an old building and how the "scene" looks that we want to take screen shots of and go in first person to enjoy. If we are looking at crappy textures, it ruins the whole experience. And when I work many hours making my textures and going through all the tedious UV mapping, I want to enjoy the end product as intended. So please, don't take the look of our textures lightly. It's actually a big deal for many of us.
Sure. I don't take it lightly, I'm not affected by it as much as others seem to be and my screens don't look as bad as some that have been posted. But I am aware it's an issue. I, and this is just personally, rate it below people who are saying "my game won't start" and "can't load my old saves", etc.
Hopefully once that is out of the way attention can be focused on the image issues for those with and without the DLC.
To be honest I was more annoyed by the poster I quoted. As a programmer myself "Do you want it quick or do you want it right" started echoing through my head.
- 2
- 1