It seems that there are no real penalties when you expand, shouldn't it be harder to hold on to the land that you've got?
Shouldn't you get massive economic penalties during the first many years of occuping provinces? as it is at the moment you get stronger every time you expand. I can't think of many situations where a nation grew stronger due to warfare, only their enemies getting weaker.
how about making it so that you have to invest money in the newly gained provinces. The more money you put in it, the lower the revolt chance gets. If you cannot pay enough the peasants will revolt and declare independence. This should not got for territories that you inheirt though, that would make it more attractive to expand through marriages.
The reason that I'm feeling something should be done about this is when I recently played a game with the HRE. The bigger I became, the easier it was, and if you start as a count in the HRE (1066) you will be pretty much invinsible when you reach 1020, maybe even earlier.
The same goes for countries like the ERE and France.
Shouldn't you get massive economic penalties during the first many years of occuping provinces? as it is at the moment you get stronger every time you expand. I can't think of many situations where a nation grew stronger due to warfare, only their enemies getting weaker.
how about making it so that you have to invest money in the newly gained provinces. The more money you put in it, the lower the revolt chance gets. If you cannot pay enough the peasants will revolt and declare independence. This should not got for territories that you inheirt though, that would make it more attractive to expand through marriages.
The reason that I'm feeling something should be done about this is when I recently played a game with the HRE. The bigger I became, the easier it was, and if you start as a count in the HRE (1066) you will be pretty much invinsible when you reach 1020, maybe even earlier.
The same goes for countries like the ERE and France.