Wow, India looks like it'll be a lot of fun to play with. I'm still trying to figure out which Commonwealth country I'm going to play with first. They all sound like a lot of fun.
Why of course South Africa! De-colonize Africa! Or- er- split Asia up with Japan for your own glory! Wait no- with support from Russia become a true power as you fight for freedom as India! Huh. Ooh, maybe let Europe defend them selves against the nazi threat while you instead assist America in creating a true sphere of influence in the Americas!Wow, India looks like it'll be a lot of fun to play with. I'm still trying to figure out which Commonwealth country I'm going to play with first. They all sound like a lot of fun.
South Africa does seem like it will be a lot of fun, but I'm also quite excited to check out Australia and India. I've already played Canada, so they're a lesser priority (though their NFs look really interesting).Why of course South Africa! De-colonize Africa! Or- er- split Asia up with Japan for your own glory! Wait no- with support from Russia become a true power as you fight for freedom as India! Huh. Ooh, maybe let Europe defend them selves against the nazi threat while you instead assist America in creating a true sphere of influence in the Americas!
I heard this when I was listing to an audiobook (https://catalog.nexpresslibrary.org/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=348337&query_desc=kw,wrdl: Roosevelt and churchill) Churchill and Roosevelt would discuss Indian independence with Roosevelt being pro independence, but Churchill was said to be very 'touchy' about the subject. I would imagine it was touchy because India was literally called the Jewel to the crown because resources of India (British Raj) and the amount of 'volunteer' forces were so great for the British Empire.Thanks, this is the type of answer I was looking for. When you say Indian independence was brought up between Roosevelt and Churchill in what context? Concerned about Indian independence? Roosevelt pushing for it?
I think touchy is lowballing it quite a bitbut Churchill was said to be very 'touchy' about the subject
No he was honest and sincere in his defense of the Noble Institutions of Empire. he also had a very deep and fascinating discourse with Ghandi, and possibly had the events of 1945 and 1948 followed a different path, India would have remained an Empire of the British Crown.I think touchy is lowballing it quite a bitI think the historically most accurate wording for Churchills view on indians and indian independence was "a massive douchebag"
![]()
The Empire in India was not a noble institution.No he was honest and sincere in his defense of the Noble Institutions of Empire. he also had a very deep and fascinating discourse with Ghandi, and possibly had the events of 1945 and 1948 followed a different path, India would have remained an Empire of the British Crown.
Ps seriously look up the Churchill Ghandi correspondence, they clearly had a kind of antagonistic mutual respect... an almost beloved enemy thing going.
I was in part being sarcastic... ultimately if history is to be judged by the actors, Churchill sincerely concieved of Empire as noble. that's what needs to be assessed else you end in relativist hermaneutic circle aka Derrida.The Empire in India was not a noble institution.
I think the plan is to make up for that with tech sharing.In the context of "historical" MP games, is there any concern that all this shiny political stuff weakens the Allies a bit too much?
The British branch of the Indian focus tree also seem to lack one tech slot.
In the context of "historical" MP games, is there any concern that all this shiny political stuff weakens the Allies a bit too much?
The British branch of the Indian focus tree also seem to lack one tech slot.
I think the plan is to make up for that with tech sharing.