So I was hoping someone here would be able to explain (in simple terms lol) why I should be willing to buy AoD when I did not like HoI2 that much anyway?
Thanks in advance for any responses.
Well, I think that whether or not you will get anything out of AoD depends less on whether or not you liked HoI2 and more on what you are interested in with the HoI series of games in general. Is your interest on a purely casual level, or does it run a little deeper?
In making a grand-strategic computer game around the second world war there are an immense plethora of concepts, ideas and mechanisms that you can use to model the innumerable different aspects of the war. HoI3 uses a large number of innovative concepts and mechanisms; AoD uses a different set. Even though participating in the making of AoD has left me little time to play HoI3 I have done so a little, and I like a lot of what I see - but I still think that we added some concepts in AoD that they missed; we made the game better in ways that HoI3 did not even consider. That is not to in any way take away from the HoI3 designers - there are plenty of mechanisms in HoI3 that caused me to think "cor, I wish I/we had thought of that!" But I hope and believe that there will be a few things we did on AoD that makes them think the same
So, to return to your question, I think if your interest is in just finding a game that suits you for a few hours of entertainment, and HoI3 does that for you, then I would say 'good luck to you - it seems you already have what you want'. If, on the other hand, you are interested in the whole business of modelling and exploring the greatest conflict in 20th century history, then I think you will find aspects of AoD that inform and delight you, and that are different from what you will find in HoI3. Commercially the two may seem like rivals (albeit one is a whale and the other a minnow!), but from an intellectual and technical perspective I see them as entirely complementary.