hoi 4 the worst game in hoi history

  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Marian76

Recruit
41 Badges
Sep 4, 2009
2
3
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Supreme Ruler: Cold War
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Semper Fi
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Steel Division: Normandy 44
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Knights of Honor
  • BATTLETECH
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Age of Wonders III
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Shadowrun Returns
  • Shadowrun: Dragonfall
  • Shadowrun: Hong Kong
  • Imperator: Rome
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Hearts of Iron IV: La Resistance
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Crusader Kings III: Royal Edition
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Victoria 2
  • 500k Club
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Stellaris
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
I'm sorry to say that but after many year from release hoi4 is still worst game in the hoi series.
- AI of defending force is reckless unit leave posiotion undefending to help in another part of front and you can not do somenthing.
- air war theatre is unreadable and not intuitive , sending air force not attached to ground unit is a disappointed.
- the worst thing is a economy and supply , which this game reduced to no correlation to reality. There is no money that has driven the economy. Germany built its industry not only thanks to work of people, but also thanks to loans from British and American (US) banks.
-What surprised me the most was the lack of a physical link between the country's capabilities and the number of divisions this country can form. I was attacked in 1945 by Slovakiac (and germany) which had over 100 infantry divisions, how this small county can form such amount of infantry divisions Total number of people of Slovakia in 1940 was 2 655 053 so 100 inf (10000 person per unit )= is about 1 milion. So this small country have 1 M men in army when population is about 3 M, it is impossible because this country can not have such men and how this army was supported, . So another thing is supply as you see standing army do not need to feed (they use no food because in game is no such variable, which we can produce) they do not use ammunition, medications, there is no army attrition when it is in home land.
-II do not understand why some resource can be storage and another can not in previous games we can storage all resources so why we can not in this game ?
No realictic economy and no realictic army support (logistic) is main problem of this game
 
  • 2
  • 1Like
  • 1
Reactions: