For nation specific playlists and music please check out jungkahns work!
http://www.europa-universalis.com/forum/showthread.php?t=193283
http://www.europa-universalis.com/forum/showthread.php?t=193283
Loki134 said:the precise definition of the type varies by country, typically having a capacity of 1/2 to 2/3 of the aircraft of a full-sized carrier. this says wiki as a definition to a CVL . i think this includes displacment , aircraft and so on . i think you have to decide from carrier to carrier , but we need some range like :
perhaps in 1938 :
CVL: 10 to 36 aircraft
CV: 37 or more aircraft
1944
CVL: 20 to 49 aircraft
CV: 50 or more aircraft
?!?!
Panther G said:Paradox calls the new unit "escort carrier" as type and the units stats suggest, that they don't mean light carrier, but escort carriers. I will try to include all suggestions made here in those alternatives:
1) No CVE, Light carrier instead, aircraft: 24-49 and >=50 (with room for flexibility around 36-60 for e.g. Illustrious and displacement)
2) CVE with Light carriers, Light carriers also in carriers, aircraft: 10-49 and >=50 (with room for flexibility around 36-60)
How about that?
Possible, but we would have to sacrifice one model and then CVE/CVL would be no longer parallel to CV in terms of models.rook749 said:I'd lean toward Option # 1.
Would it be possible to have five models of CVE's and 5 Models of CVL's? The CVE's would have far lower stats then the CLV's (due to less planes). Or is it not possible to break the ten models for the escort carries up like this?
Panther G said:Paradox calls the new unit "escort carrier" as type and the units stats suggest, that they don't mean light carrier, but escort carriers. I will try to include all suggestions made here in those alternatives:
1) No CVE, Light carrier instead, aircraft: 24-49 and >=50 (with room for flexibility around 36-60 for e.g. Illustrious and displacement)
2) CVE with Light carriers, Light carriers also in carriers, aircraft: 10-49 and >=50 (with room for flexibility around 36-60)
How about that?
Panther G said:v0.50 is out (Doomsday)
Possible, but not so easy to realize. We have no free brigade and the question is, is the improvement worth the effort. For detail it would be best to have CVE,CVL and CV, but you have to simplify the whole thing to some degree.Heimdall.de said:An idea comes to my mind .. would it be possible to convert the new DD "escort carrier" to real light carriers by adding new "Light CAG" brigades which can be attached to CVL's and CV's, and converting the existing CAG to "Heavy CAG" which can only be attached to the big carriers?
So you could essentially model both the ships themselves as well as their smaller aigroups.
DD improvements were incorporated into HIP or in other words the old HIP with those new DD features.Zakouski said:Could you give some details on what you've done to DD ??
The dates in game are not equal to the *.inc file. All Paradox 1936 scenario developements seem to be finished in 1936Loki134 said:panther , in the 1936-scenario all ships of germany , which are in development will be finished in 1936 ! in the germany.inc is no mistake , so i don´t know where is the bug . does anybody has the same bug ?!
I will upload the latest file again. You have put it to the right folder (...\Doomsday HIP\map\)?kabex said:What the hell? The naval thingy file doesn't work, it makes the game crash to desktop(yes I extracted it fine)... and the game took more than 20mins to load without it so I shut the application... now I am going to have to try again and find something else to do for a damn hour.
Fix this.
(DD version).
HIP will usually be for the latest patch and exp gain still uses HIP values and NOT DD ones.kabex said:D'oh, doesn't work with DD 1.0... WHY oh why would you port it to 1.1? It's crap. Leader exp is complete bs, airplane exp is complete bs, purchasing blueprints/divisions is complete bs(impossible) etc.![]()