Hi
At one side of the map I have a small industrial (generic) section which is doing fine with a goods train set to export goods. This is great as the proximity of the goods train station is close enough for the generated goods traffic to be kept within the industrial section.
At the opposite side of my map I have tried again to develop the agricultural industry, even though I am having a problem time with people not wanting to work there over other type of work, even generic industry seems to get fully staffed over that of farming. But...
To prevent the need for the heavy vehicles transporting the farmed goods to the opposite end of the map (through the centre of the city etc) I built another good train station and connected it by highway just adjacent and close to the farming industry.
But the trucks still prefer to get stuck in traffic, cause congestion and drive to the opposite end of the map and use the same goods train as the generic industry one does - grr.
So I decided to restrict the residential zone where the trucks are passing through from heavy traffic (assuming that the mass of trucks going through it are classed as that). But even with reducing a section of road to a simple two lane (as highways would be ignored by the ban) the trucks still travel through the city to the opposite end of the map. But there are many other roads that they are passing through within that residential zone which are not highways, so really the two laner was not needed.
If I delete that section of road then the truck use the goods train yard nearest to the farms and all is well. Pop the section back in and then they stop using that one and start using the one furthest away.
should I expect the Heavy Truck Ban to apply to those trucks carrying the agricultural products to the goods yard at the opposite end of the map...? Even so why do they wish to use that one so far away through dense traffic against that of a functioning one right next to them...?
At one side of the map I have a small industrial (generic) section which is doing fine with a goods train set to export goods. This is great as the proximity of the goods train station is close enough for the generated goods traffic to be kept within the industrial section.
At the opposite side of my map I have tried again to develop the agricultural industry, even though I am having a problem time with people not wanting to work there over other type of work, even generic industry seems to get fully staffed over that of farming. But...
To prevent the need for the heavy vehicles transporting the farmed goods to the opposite end of the map (through the centre of the city etc) I built another good train station and connected it by highway just adjacent and close to the farming industry.
But the trucks still prefer to get stuck in traffic, cause congestion and drive to the opposite end of the map and use the same goods train as the generic industry one does - grr.
So I decided to restrict the residential zone where the trucks are passing through from heavy traffic (assuming that the mass of trucks going through it are classed as that). But even with reducing a section of road to a simple two lane (as highways would be ignored by the ban) the trucks still travel through the city to the opposite end of the map. But there are many other roads that they are passing through within that residential zone which are not highways, so really the two laner was not needed.
If I delete that section of road then the truck use the goods train yard nearest to the farms and all is well. Pop the section back in and then they stop using that one and start using the one furthest away.
should I expect the Heavy Truck Ban to apply to those trucks carrying the agricultural products to the goods yard at the opposite end of the map...? Even so why do they wish to use that one so far away through dense traffic against that of a functioning one right next to them...?