The realm rejoices as Paradox Interactive announces the launch of Crusader Kings III, the latest entry in the publisher’s grand strategy role-playing game franchise. Advisors may now jockey for positions of influence and adversaries should save their schemes for another day, because on this day Crusader Kings III can be purchased on Steam, the Paradox Store, and other major online retailers.
What about Resources?
Depending on impact on supply, I fear that resistance will be neglected by players. For instance, while being deep in Russia near Ural, why should I care about all that vast previously conquered land. If it doesn’t hinder my troops that are in already very bad infrastructure area, and there are not many factories justifying use of my troops there (which can be costly due to high attrition), I will probably don’t bother at all. Whack-a-mole is one thing, but big national upraising in case of neglected areas is a different thing (EU4 reduced whack-a-mole by making less but more significant uprisings).
How about this kind of template for the MP division:
People used cavalry in HOI3 because they were mobile to chase down the whack-a-mole uprisings. You can use foot Infantry, with a garrison template with a few battalions, and some MPs. If you have the ground experience points you can have two garrison templates, one for at home to protect VPs and naval bases, the other for occupation duties.Question though, I mean it makes sense to have MP a support but why not just make them units instead of having to use Calvary (insert players choice of regiment) as the main force? I don't expect my cavalry as an example to do much should they get hit by invasion an invasion force or such but I would think they are more expensive to build and hence will not be useful other than anti-partisan warfare for the cost they incur. If I do have to have a regular regiment to perform such duties is it possible that I can set that template alone to not receive upgrades so as not to dwindle my supply of better equipment which would serve a greater purpose of equipping my front line divisions with equipment? I guess that's two questions
Indeed, I can agree with that but it just seems expensive to have even just one Calvary/Infantry regiment in all of the provinces just to suppress Partisans unless I'm missing that it's only needed on a state level which I doubt. I mean I suppose you don't have too have them in all but I thought industry was at a state level hence any provinces within the state would require suppression to reduce losses to factories.
then resistance will blow up all your factories in these areas and it will keep spreading outwards (one of the factors on resistance gain speed is neighbor provinces with resistance).
oop, I totally forgot. resource extraction also scales by occupation policy so you get 30% less if you use gentle right now
If you don't care about the factories, just put them on the gentlest setting and don't station police units. You're not caring about the resistance or their effects either way, and at least then you can at least milk a bit of manpower out of the region. Or just give the region to someone else.
I'm not sure I'm getting this right. Could you please clarify?
you can both click on the map and list. If you noticed the states I picked are selected on mapI dont really like to see that u give away Provinces from a list rather then a map, where u can pick them.
I have the bad feeling this will ent up in endless searching which province in east russia is which
.png){kind=avatar}
), wouldn't some nationalist or simply patriotic people organise the liberation of the country ?
STOP! COOKIE TIME
