None of those options look mutually exclusive. So the US might simultaneously battle the fascist menace and strike at the empire?
- 7
Then, if i play a country of south america, it will be impossible to make war against my neighbor . So it will be very boring. No ?
Next week we'll be explaining why its a bad idea to tell 40 mechanized divisions to attack the Gobi desert.
Next week we'll be explaining why its a bad idea to tell 40 mechanized divisions to attack the Gobi desert.
political power. it is something like monarchy points from EU4What does PP stand for?
It is my opinion that goes against history. USA has a history about their dictatorial friends.Reaffirm Monroe Doctrine - Turning entire americas into democracies that like the US, with possibilities to create pro-democratic civil wars.
right that, just could remember off the top of my head at that point in time. Thanks.political power. it is something like monarchy points from EU4
What if USA turns fascist or communist?Reaffirm Monroe Doctrine - Turning entire americas into democracies that like the US, with possibilities to create pro-democratic civil wars.
Then, if i play a country of south america, it will be impossible to make war against my neighbor . So it will be very boring. No ?
Well you can have an alliance with a faction leader, or maybe this is only available between two faction leaders or two faction-less countries...(countries on the same "level" ?), anyhow remember the German-USSR Unholy alliance national focus? This is probably similar to that in that you only form an alliance, you don't actually join that faction.From the looks of the war-plan branches, it doesn't look like the US has to change their government to support a given ideology? But then Jonah also mentions
"Home of the Free, which allows them to create factions, but not to join any faction led by another ideology."
Can you guys kind of walk us through the thinking there? Am I missing something?