Hearts of iron 4 and multiplayer save checking, more like EU 4 please?

  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

NeFuRii

Captain
40 Badges
May 2, 2006
320
809
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Cities: Skylines Industries
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Stellaris: Lithoids
  • Hearts of Iron IV: La Resistance
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Battle for Bosporus
  • Stellaris: Necroids
  • Stellaris: Nemesis
  • Hearts of Iron IV: By Blood Alone
  • Hearts of Iron IV: No Step Back
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Cities: Skylines - After Dark
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Cities: Skylines - Snowfall
  • Stellaris
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Cities: Skylines - Mass Transit
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
I've been enjoying multiplayer Hearts of Iron and Stellaris for quite some time now.
But one thing has always been bothering me - the ease of checking multiplayer saves between sessions by unfair players.
All such a player has to do is save the game on his end and load it up in singleplayer, then he can check other players strategies, buildups etc. This is pretty game breaking when someone does that just before the war, and it's impossible to detect if someone did that, other than guessing, but guessing can lead to false accusations too, which isnt good either.

But the issue comes mostly from how easy it is to do that. It's obvious that PDX won't be able to prevent hackers from accessing even the best securities on a file that is stored locally, but that's not what is expected. In fact, very little effort on PDX side could lead to huge improvement. If people had to manually edit the save game to unlock it for singleplayer, it would already prevent probably more than half of such players from checking saves. (this is just an example. there is no perfect way to protect the saves, but any way is better than no way at all, as long as its optional)

Very little effort from programmers but with very big impact. And this is what this post is about:
I'm hoping Stellaris and Hearts of Iron devs can implement rudimentary save game protection.

I'm aware there are other issues with those games, and people not interested in multiplayer may not want resources taken away from fixing the game, but it is so little effort required, that i think nothing else would suffer if such a feature was to be added. It would help us, multiplayer lovers, a lot!

Also, often people say something like "you should play with people you can trust". But this doesn't really apply here. Most hardcore cheats affect the game in obvious ways, and people using them are obvious cheaters. Save checking is by comparison much simpler and much more hard to detect, and even people who are typically trustworthy could give in to the temptation of checking a save game, so i don't think its a practical solution, especially since its impossible to verify who actually did that.

All the players I play with online acknowledge this issue and express their hope for PDX to address it, but I have not seen too many posts on the forums regarding it.

Now, the thing that made me write this is that normally i play MP Hoi and Stellaris. Up until recently I have played Europa Universalis 4 only in single player. Yesterday that changed, and i was surprised to see this option in the multiplayer lobby of that game:

mp_save.jpg


So, seeing that they already have it in one game, maybe it would be possible to make it standard option for all currently developed and future paradox games? It's a small but super useful feature.
Thank you.
 
Last edited:
  • 2Like
Reactions:

jpd

Entil'Zha Anla'Shok
Moderator
41 Badges
Apr 19, 2001
8.038
1.757
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Hearts of Iron IV: No Step Back
  • Hearts of Iron IV: By Blood Alone
  • Battle for Bosporus
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Hearts of Iron II: Beta
  • Arsenal of Democracy
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Field Marshal
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Colonel
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Hearts of Iron IV: La Resistance
While these options may sound nice, they don't remove your basic problem : trust.

Now everyone has to trust the host not to take a peek into the save game. Granted, the problem area has been made smaller (everyone vs. the host instead of everyone vs. everyone), but the trust problem hasn't gone away. ;)

As for editable save game. That doesn't remove your basic problem either. Anyone can take a peek in a save game with any sort of text editor, of which Windows itself already provides two: notepad and wordpad.
 

NeFuRii

Captain
40 Badges
May 2, 2006
320
809
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Cities: Skylines Industries
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Stellaris: Lithoids
  • Hearts of Iron IV: La Resistance
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Battle for Bosporus
  • Stellaris: Necroids
  • Stellaris: Nemesis
  • Hearts of Iron IV: By Blood Alone
  • Hearts of Iron IV: No Step Back
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Cities: Skylines - After Dark
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Cities: Skylines - Snowfall
  • Stellaris
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Cities: Skylines - Mass Transit
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
There is no perfect solution here.
There is only "very little programming effort to reduce the problem by a lot". So this accomplishes exactly that.
Host will have to be trusted, but host also knows that others can't save, so he won't think "ok, others can check, so i should check the save too, not to fall behind others".
I've played organised discord games with 20+ players. They are super fun. But it's hard to imagine all of those 20 people can be trusted.
If its only host, even if he does cheat, then at least i know the 19 other players did not, so my war plans against those 19 other people are most likely safe.

The idea is to make it more difficult, without dedicating too much developer time. Making it completely impossible is hard and not worth the developer's effort, in fact probably it's not possible anyway.
 
Last edited:
  • 1
Reactions:

Fulmen

The Winter War was only 7% of Finland's WW2
73 Badges
Dec 23, 2006
5.969
6.025
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Europa Universalis: Rome
  • Rome Gold
  • Victoria 2
  • Rome: Vae Victis
  • War of the Roses
  • War of the Vikings
  • 500k Club
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Europa Universalis IV: Pre-order
  • Mount & Blade: Warband
  • Mount & Blade: With Fire and Sword
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Stellaris
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Hearts of Iron IV Sign-up
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Colonel
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Field Marshal
  • Hearts of Iron IV: No Step Back
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Darkest Hour
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis III: Chronicles
  • Arsenal of Democracy
  • Divine Wind
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • March of the Eagles
EU4 is the only PDX game they play competitively in-house on a regular basis and at a meaningful scale, hence the many MP-inspired QoL features and balance changes that game has received over the years. One would wish their other games got the same level of attentiveness to MP-related balance, bugs, exploits and other issues.
 

NeFuRii

Captain
40 Badges
May 2, 2006
320
809
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Cities: Skylines Industries
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Stellaris: Lithoids
  • Hearts of Iron IV: La Resistance
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Battle for Bosporus
  • Stellaris: Necroids
  • Stellaris: Nemesis
  • Hearts of Iron IV: By Blood Alone
  • Hearts of Iron IV: No Step Back
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Cities: Skylines - After Dark
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Cities: Skylines - Snowfall
  • Stellaris
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Cities: Skylines - Mass Transit
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
EU4 is the only PDX game they play competitively in-house on a regular basis and at a meaningful scale, hence the many MP-inspired QoL features and balance changes that game has received over the years.
I understand. But that's why i'm posting, to try to show there are players who care about it. Recognition of the issue is necessary. If I'm alone in this, then of course it won't happen, but i know i'm not alone simply by exchanging views with other players i played with.
Is it enough to make PDX address this issue? I don't know.

My key argument is that it seems to be very little development effort required to make it work.
And to be honest, I don't have any statistical data, but the number of players playing multiplayer hearts of iron and stellaris games are both quite big. I don't know how it stacks up against EU4, and i will not try to guess, but there are definetly many people playing all 3 games in multiplayer, competitively or not. Even non competitive games could benefit from this.