Noble man are better protectors of the nation than the masses as long as nations interests are equal to theirs or they are forced to see nation's interests as their own. For example, good example is Russia which is controlled by few and yet, it's fiercely patriotic and its strategy is highly nationalistic. It prioritizes strategical power over financial and prefers military might, subversive activities such as their extremely extensive web of spies or its own push towards important R&D sectors such as space, arms industry, high technology. Russia is known to go over great pains to ensure that these strategic sectors are competitive and dominant. But it's off topic. My bad, just wanted to show how concentrated rule is preferable in tough times rather than loose rule of democracies.