Great Vote Thread
- Thread starter KaRei
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Samilou said:
What you have in mind? EDIT:
I found somewhere a poll. It has nothing with these votes, but I am refering to it only to look how the poll looks: this
It would be nice to have something like this here. But I don't know how to make it. Can anybody help? Please.
Last edited:
with a standard poll I'm not sure you could add topics later and allow people having already voted to vote again.
It is hard to manage your poll, but I appreciate your dedication
Control over DP sliders only through player's decisions (Sliders) YES but does not seem easy to code unless make it look like events
Ability to set a target for DP sliders (Sliders) NO
Ability to move DP sliders by more steps (Sliders) NO
3 kinds of armies (Troop building?) YES
Commanders instead armies (Troop building?) NO
It is hard to manage your poll, but I appreciate your dedication
Control over DP sliders only through player's decisions (Sliders) YES but does not seem easy to code unless make it look like events
Ability to set a target for DP sliders (Sliders) NO
Ability to move DP sliders by more steps (Sliders) NO
3 kinds of armies (Troop building?) YES
Commanders instead armies (Troop building?) NO
Every idea could have it's own poll. When I'll want to add another idea, I'll create new poll for it. And people having already voted for older ideas would be able to vote in new poll.hildoceras said:
Is it possible?
Control over DP sliders only through player's decisions - YES
Ability to move DP sliders by more steps - NO
3 kinds of armies - Interesting, I don't say Yes, but I don't say NO
Commanders instead armies - NO, EU is a STRATEGY game, not tactical.
Tax slider - YES
Multi-cultural/religious province - YES
Correct autosending merchants - YES, it's highly needed.
Ability to found new CoT - NO
Remove counters in case of more figure sprites - NO
Rework battle phases in case of more unit types - NO, EU is a strategy game.
Making battles more important for WS - NO
Add traderoutes (no CoTs) - NO, If I like to play EU not Call to Power.
Add traderoutes (still keep CoTs) - NO, as above.
More religions in game - Yes, maybe less than 15, but new religions are highly needed.
Making some battles decisive for the war - YES it's realistic. For example in XVI-XVII Poland-Lithuania has won it's wars due to battles not sieges.
Capital moving after conquest - YES
Support of infantry, cavalry and artillery sprites - NO
Support of more figures in sprite dependent on army size - NO, it's not an Age of Empires
More unit types than 3 - YES, again P-L as an example. In XVII P-L has biggest number of cannons in whole Europe, but almost neves has used them on battle fields (All cannons was used to defend castles and cities).
Rework inflation to more realistic -NO
Insert nomads into game - NO, EU is not a Civilisation.
Spontaneous colonization and colony growth - YES
Ability to move DP sliders by more steps - NO
3 kinds of armies - Interesting, I don't say Yes, but I don't say NO
Commanders instead armies - NO, EU is a STRATEGY game, not tactical.
Tax slider - YES
Multi-cultural/religious province - YES
Correct autosending merchants - YES, it's highly needed.
Ability to found new CoT - NO
Remove counters in case of more figure sprites - NO
Rework battle phases in case of more unit types - NO, EU is a strategy game.
Making battles more important for WS - NO
Add traderoutes (no CoTs) - NO, If I like to play EU not Call to Power.
Add traderoutes (still keep CoTs) - NO, as above.
More religions in game - Yes, maybe less than 15, but new religions are highly needed.
Making some battles decisive for the war - YES it's realistic. For example in XVI-XVII Poland-Lithuania has won it's wars due to battles not sieges.
Capital moving after conquest - YES
Support of infantry, cavalry and artillery sprites - NO
Support of more figures in sprite dependent on army size - NO, it's not an Age of Empires
More unit types than 3 - YES, again P-L as an example. In XVII P-L has biggest number of cannons in whole Europe, but almost neves has used them on battle fields (All cannons was used to defend castles and cities).
Rework inflation to more realistic -NO
Insert nomads into game - NO, EU is not a Civilisation.
Spontaneous colonization and colony growth - YES
Control over DP sliders only through player's decisions (Sliders): yes
Ability to set a target for DP sliders (Sliders): yes
Ability to move DP sliders by more steps (Sliders): no
3 kinds of armies (Troop building?): yes
Commanders instead armies (Troop building?): no
(Can we have inflation done right): yes
Multi-cultural/religious province (Religion in EU): yes
Correct autosending merchants (Please, KILL COT's DEAD! ): yes
Ability to found new CoT (Please, KILL COT's DEAD! ): yes
Remove counters in case of more figure sprites (More then one unit type please!): yes
Rework battle phases in case of more unit types (More then one unit type please!): yes
Making battles more important for WS (Decisive battles) - in oposition with "Making some battles decisive for the war": no
Add traderoutes (no CoTs) (Please, KILL COT's DEAD! ): no
"Add traderoutes (still keep CoTs)": yes
Add traderoutes (still keep CoTs) (Please, KILL COT's DEAD! ) - in oposition with "Add traderoutes (no CoTs)": yes
More religions in game (Religion in EU, More Religions): yes
Making some battles decisive for the war (Decisive battles) - in oposition with "Making battles more important for WS": yes
Ability to annex province with capital (Capital moving after conquest?): yes
Support of infantry, cavalry and artillery sprites (More then one unit type please!): yes
Support of more figures in sprite dependent on army size (More then one unit type please!): yes
More unit types than 3 (More then one unit type please!): yes
Rework inflation to more realistic (Can we have inflation done right): yes
Insert nomads into game (Nomads): yes
Spontaneous colonization and colony growth (Colonial Growth): its there already
Please add:
Get rid of DiploAnexation - by event only (DA is abused to ahistorical levels): yes
Ability to set a target for DP sliders (Sliders): yes
Ability to move DP sliders by more steps (Sliders): no
3 kinds of armies (Troop building?): yes
Commanders instead armies (Troop building?): no
(Can we have inflation done right): yes
Multi-cultural/religious province (Religion in EU): yes
Correct autosending merchants (Please, KILL COT's DEAD! ): yes
Ability to found new CoT (Please, KILL COT's DEAD! ): yes
Remove counters in case of more figure sprites (More then one unit type please!): yes
Rework battle phases in case of more unit types (More then one unit type please!): yes
Making battles more important for WS (Decisive battles) - in oposition with "Making some battles decisive for the war": no
Add traderoutes (no CoTs) (Please, KILL COT's DEAD! ): no
"Add traderoutes (still keep CoTs)": yes
Add traderoutes (still keep CoTs) (Please, KILL COT's DEAD! ) - in oposition with "Add traderoutes (no CoTs)": yes
More religions in game (Religion in EU, More Religions): yes
Making some battles decisive for the war (Decisive battles) - in oposition with "Making battles more important for WS": yes
Ability to annex province with capital (Capital moving after conquest?): yes
Support of infantry, cavalry and artillery sprites (More then one unit type please!): yes
Support of more figures in sprite dependent on army size (More then one unit type please!): yes
More unit types than 3 (More then one unit type please!): yes
Rework inflation to more realistic (Can we have inflation done right): yes
Insert nomads into game (Nomads): yes
Spontaneous colonization and colony growth (Colonial Growth): its there already
Please add:
Get rid of DiploAnexation - by event only (DA is abused to ahistorical levels): yes
more religions- Yes
but no possibilty to get baptism as religion of the state.
That woud be realy unrealistic for the period of time. (I´m studying history of christianity in school)
Ability to annex province with capital - Yes
Insert nomads into game (Nomads)- Yes
Spontaneous colonization and colony growth- Yes
And from another tread that was no votingpossibility about
Separate cities/rural areas - Yes
but no possibilty to get baptism as religion of the state.
That woud be realy unrealistic for the period of time. (I´m studying history of christianity in school)
Ability to annex province with capital - Yes
Insert nomads into game (Nomads)- Yes
Spontaneous colonization and colony growth- Yes
And from another tread that was no votingpossibility about
Separate cities/rural areas - Yes
Last edited:
Spontanious colonization and colony growth = Yes
More unit types than 3 = No
Support of more figures dependent on size = No
Support of inf/cav/art sprites = No
Ability to set a target for DP sliders = YES!
More unit types than 3 = No
Support of more figures dependent on size = No
Support of inf/cav/art sprites = No
Ability to set a target for DP sliders = YES!
Separate cities/rural areas in provinces (Separate cities/rural areas and an idea about income) = Yes
Get rid of DiploAnexation - by event only (DA is abused to ahistorical levels) = No
Control over DP sliders only through player's decisions (Sliders) = Yes
Ability to set a target for DP sliders (Sliders)=No
Ability to move DP sliders by more steps (Sliders)=No
3 kinds of armies (Troop building?)=Yes
Commanders instead armies (Troop building?)=No
Tax slider (Can we have inflation done right)=Yes
Multi-cultural/religious province (Religion in EU)=Yes
Correct autosending merchants (Please, KILL COT's DEAD! )=Yes
Ability to found new CoT (Please, KILL COT's DEAD! )=No
Rework battle phases in case of more unit types (More then one unit type please!)=No
Making battles more important for WS (Decisive battles) - in oposition with "Making some battles decisive for the war"=No
Add traderoutes (no CoTs) (Please, KILL COT's DEAD! ) - in oposition with "Add traderoutes (still keep CoTs)"=No
Add traderoutes (still keep CoTs) (Please, KILL COT's DEAD! ) - in oposition with "Add traderoutes (no CoTs)"=Yes
More religions in game (Religion in EU, More Religions)=Yes
Making some battles decisive for the war (Decisive battles) - in oposition with "Making battles more important for WS"=No
Ability to annex province with capital (Capital moving after conquest?)=No
Support of infantry, cavalry and artillery sprites (More then one unit type please!)=No
Support of more figures in sprite dependent on army size (More then one unit type please!)=Yes
More unit types than 3 (More then one unit type please!)=Yes
Rework inflation to more realistic (Can we have inflation done right)=Yes
Insert nomads into game (Nomads)=No
Spontaneous colonization and colony growth (Colonial Growth)=Yes
Get rid of DiploAnexation - by event only (DA is abused to ahistorical levels) = No
Control over DP sliders only through player's decisions (Sliders) = Yes
Ability to set a target for DP sliders (Sliders)=No
Ability to move DP sliders by more steps (Sliders)=No
3 kinds of armies (Troop building?)=Yes
Commanders instead armies (Troop building?)=No
Tax slider (Can we have inflation done right)=Yes
Multi-cultural/religious province (Religion in EU)=Yes
Correct autosending merchants (Please, KILL COT's DEAD! )=Yes
Ability to found new CoT (Please, KILL COT's DEAD! )=No
Rework battle phases in case of more unit types (More then one unit type please!)=No
Making battles more important for WS (Decisive battles) - in oposition with "Making some battles decisive for the war"=No
Add traderoutes (no CoTs) (Please, KILL COT's DEAD! ) - in oposition with "Add traderoutes (still keep CoTs)"=No
Add traderoutes (still keep CoTs) (Please, KILL COT's DEAD! ) - in oposition with "Add traderoutes (no CoTs)"=Yes
More religions in game (Religion in EU, More Religions)=Yes
Making some battles decisive for the war (Decisive battles) - in oposition with "Making battles more important for WS"=No
Ability to annex province with capital (Capital moving after conquest?)=No
Support of infantry, cavalry and artillery sprites (More then one unit type please!)=No
Support of more figures in sprite dependent on army size (More then one unit type please!)=Yes
More unit types than 3 (More then one unit type please!)=Yes
Rework inflation to more realistic (Can we have inflation done right)=Yes
Insert nomads into game (Nomads)=No
Spontaneous colonization and colony growth (Colonial Growth)=Yes
Separate cities/rural areas in provinces NO
Get rid of DiploAnexation - by event only NO but... DA should not be abused to ahistorical levels
Get rid of DiploAnexation - by event only NO but... DA should not be abused to ahistorical levels
NO : Separate cities/rural areas in provinces (Separate cities/rural areas and an idea about income) ; not clear enough proposal yet
NO : Get rid of DiploAnexation - by event only (DA is abused to ahistorical levels) ; reworked, yes, but get rid off, no
YES : Control over DP sliders only through player's decisions (Sliders)
YES : Ability to set a target for DP sliders (Sliders)
YES : Ability to move DP sliders by more steps (Sliders) ; if none of the former two are taken
YES : 3 kinds of armies (Troop building?)
NO : Commanders instead armies (Troop building?)
YES : Tax slider (Can we have inflation done right)
YES : Multi-cultural/religious province (Religion in EU) ; for another similar proposal, there was another thread, but I've forgotten which
NO : Get rid of DiploAnexation - by event only (DA is abused to ahistorical levels) ; reworked, yes, but get rid off, no
YES : Control over DP sliders only through player's decisions (Sliders)
YES : Ability to set a target for DP sliders (Sliders)
YES : Ability to move DP sliders by more steps (Sliders) ; if none of the former two are taken
YES : 3 kinds of armies (Troop building?)
NO : Commanders instead armies (Troop building?)
YES : Tax slider (Can we have inflation done right)
YES : Multi-cultural/religious province (Religion in EU) ; for another similar proposal, there was another thread, but I've forgotten which
Get rid of DiploAnexation - by event only: NO
Control over DP sliders only through player's decisions: NO
Ability to set a target for DP sliders YES
Commanders instead armies NO
Multi-cultural/religious province YES
Add traderoutes (no CoTs) NO
More religions in game YES
Ability to annex province with capital YES
Spontaneous colonization and colony growth NO
Decisive Battles YES
RELIGION:
Split protestants YES add Anabaptists/dissenters only
Split Islam: NO
Mandaeism NO
Split Buddhism: NO
Split Confucianism/Oriental synchretism NO
Jainism NO
Sikhism YES
Control over DP sliders only through player's decisions: NO
Ability to set a target for DP sliders YES
Commanders instead armies NO
Multi-cultural/religious province YES
Add traderoutes (no CoTs) NO
More religions in game YES
Ability to annex province with capital YES
Spontaneous colonization and colony growth NO
Decisive Battles YES
RELIGION:
Split protestants YES add Anabaptists/dissenters only
Split Islam: NO
Mandaeism NO
Split Buddhism: NO
Split Confucianism/Oriental synchretism NO
Jainism NO
Sikhism YES
List of religions was added on first post. You can now vote for each religion if you want it to split, or want to add.
Note for those who suggested a real poll: Only moderator can create a poll. As you can see, there are many ideas and each of them needs separate poll. New ideas are added during the time and it will need new and new polls. This poll is very dynamic and it would be very difficult to manage real poll.
Note for those who didn't vote yet: I'm recommending to vote now, when there are not so much ideas. In later time it will be very boring to vote for 50-70 ideas at once for example. I agree that real poll where you can easy click on your choice would be better, but Great Vote Thread is very dynamic and it would be hard to manage real poll.
Note for those who suggested a real poll: Only moderator can create a poll. As you can see, there are many ideas and each of them needs separate poll. New ideas are added during the time and it will need new and new polls. This poll is very dynamic and it would be very difficult to manage real poll.
Note for those who didn't vote yet: I'm recommending to vote now, when there are not so much ideas. In later time it will be very boring to vote for 50-70 ideas at once for example. I agree that real poll where you can easy click on your choice would be better, but Great Vote Thread is very dynamic and it would be hard to manage real poll.
Multi-cultural/religious province (Religion in EU) YES
Add traderoutes (still keep CoTs) (Please, KILL COT's DEAD! ) - in oposition with "Add traderoutes (no CoTs)" YES
More religions in game (Religion in EU, More Religions) YES
Ability to annex province with capital (Capital moving after conquest?) YES
Add traderoutes (still keep CoTs) (Please, KILL COT's DEAD! ) - in oposition with "Add traderoutes (no CoTs)" YES
More religions in game (Religion in EU, More Religions) YES
Ability to annex province with capital (Capital moving after conquest?) YES
Control over DP sliders only through player's decisions - YES
Ability to move DP sliders by more steps - NO
3 kinds of armies - YES
Commanders instead armies - NO
Tax slider - YES
Multi-cultural/religious province - YES
Correct autosending merchants - YES
Ability to found new CoT - NO
Remove counters in case of more figure sprites - NO
Rework battle phases in case of more unit types - NO
Making battles more important for WS - UNDECIDED
Add traderoutes (no CoTs) - NO
Add traderoutes (still keep CoTs) - UNDECIDED
More religions in game - YES
Making some battles decisive for the war - YES
Capital moving after conquest - YES
Support of infantry, cavalry and artillery sprites - NO
Support of more figures in sprite dependent on army size - NO
More unit types than 3 - YES
Rework inflation to more realistic -YES
Insert nomads into game - NO
Spontaneous colonization and colony growth - YES
RELIGION:
Split protestants NO
Split Islam: YES (only Shiite/Sunni)
Mandaeism NO
Split Buddhism: YES
Split Confucianism/Oriental synchretism NO
Jainism NO
Sikhism YES
Ability to move DP sliders by more steps - NO
3 kinds of armies - YES
Commanders instead armies - NO
Tax slider - YES
Multi-cultural/religious province - YES
Correct autosending merchants - YES
Ability to found new CoT - NO
Remove counters in case of more figure sprites - NO
Rework battle phases in case of more unit types - NO
Making battles more important for WS - UNDECIDED
Add traderoutes (no CoTs) - NO
Add traderoutes (still keep CoTs) - UNDECIDED
More religions in game - YES
Making some battles decisive for the war - YES
Capital moving after conquest - YES
Support of infantry, cavalry and artillery sprites - NO
Support of more figures in sprite dependent on army size - NO
More unit types than 3 - YES
Rework inflation to more realistic -YES
Insert nomads into game - NO
Spontaneous colonization and colony growth - YES
RELIGION:
Split protestants NO
Split Islam: YES (only Shiite/Sunni)
Mandaeism NO
Split Buddhism: YES
Split Confucianism/Oriental synchretism NO
Jainism NO
Sikhism YES
I think you may need to rephrase or add another section to religions because "split more than suggested" implies that there should be all those branches plus more.
Ch'n and Zen are essentially the same. And they are technically branches of Mahayana.
Ch'n and Zen are essentially the same. And they are technically branches of Mahayana.
Exactly. I had to define some barriers, so I didn't place there ability "other than suggested". On the other hand I am giving an option to say if somebody want to split some religion really much.Jinnai said:
Thanks. I looked in wikipedia and found that Ch'an is chinese, Zen is japanese, Seon is korean and Thien is vietnamese name for Mahayana buddhism. I deleted them from the list.Jinnai said:
Well...they're branches like Calvanism is to Protestantism.KaRei said:
However they all are very similar to one another. Ch'n is the original and what the others are based off of, but Zen is the more widely known to westerners.
KaRei said:
But that is wrong, Ch'an/Zen is a form of Mahayana Buddhism but it is not Mahayana Buddhism, just like Lutheranism is a form of protestantism, but then so are Baptists, Calvinists and Anabaptists. but you wouldn't say Lutheranism is Protestantism, unless you were being extremely general and sloppy and also claiming anabaptists and Calvinists were not Protestant.
For example Tibetan Buddhism, aka Lamaism, is by no means Ch'an Buddhism but they are both Mahayana.
While Ch'an is sort of compatible with say the Pure Land sect of Mahayana, the most popular school of Mahayana Buddhism in China, it is really different in practice. personally I think Mahayana and Theraveda are more than enough categories for Buddhism at the EU3 level, but if say it was a game about just Japan, dividing up Mahayana would be a good idea. But as most Mahayana Buddhists in China, Korea, Japan mix them all up. Tibetans and
Mongolians for example don't really do this. All are Mahayana Buddhists however.
Last edited:
My views on religious diversity
ADD Judaism (add: 0% 0/0)
DON'T ADD Samaritanism (add: 0% 0/0)
Christianity
KEEP *Orthodoxy
KEEP *Catholicism
KEEP *Protestantism (split: 100% 1/0)
ADD -Lutheranism
ADD -Anglicanism (-100% 0/1)
ADD -Calvinism
DON'T ADD -Babtists (-100% 0/1)
DON'T ADD -Anababtists (100% 1/0)
DON'T ADD -Unitarians (-100% 0/1)
ADD Islam (split: -100% 0/1)
ADD *Kharijites (0% 0/0)
KEEP *Shiite
DON'T ADD *Ghulat (0% 0/0)
KEEP *Sunni
DON'T ADD *Zikri (0% 0/0)
Split more than suggested (0% 0/0)
DON'T ADD Mandaeism (add: -100% 0/1)
ADD Hinduism (split: 0% 0/0)
*Agama Hindu Dharma (Javanese Hinduism) (0% 0/0)
ADD *Shaivism (0% 0/0)
ADD *Shaktism (0% 0/0)
ADD *Smartism (0% 0/0)
ADD *Vaishnavism (0% 0/0)
Split more than suggested (0% 0/0)
ADD Buddhism (split: -100% 0/1)
ADD *Mahayana (0% 0/0)
ADD *Theravada (0% 0/0)
ADD *Vajrayana (0% 0/0)
Split more than suggested (0% 0/0)
Confucianism (renamed to Oriental syncretism) (split: -100% 0/1)
ADD *Taoism (0% 0/0)
ADD *Shintoism (0% 0/0)
Split more than suggested (0% 0/0)
ADD Jainism (add: -100% 0/1)
ADD Sikhism (add: 100% 1/0)
DON'T ADD Zoroastrianism (add 0% 0/0)
DON'T ADD Gnosticism (add 0% 0/0)
ADD Vaishnavism (add 0% 0/0) (THIS IS A REPEAT OF POLL UNDER HINDUISM)
ADD Pagans: (split: 0% 0/0)
ADD *Animism (0% 0/0) - believe that all things have their soul (Navajo for example)
ADD *Pantheism (0% 0/0) - many gods (Inca, Aztecs, Maya, ancient European religions)
ADD *Shamanism (0% 0/0) - believe in good and evil spirits (african tribes, CENTRAL ASIA)
Split pagans more than suggested (0% 0/0)
Add more other religions than suggested (0% 0/0) NO WAY
Don't split religions, merge them (less religions than in Eu2) (0% 0/0) NO WAY
ADD Judaism (add: 0% 0/0)
DON'T ADD Samaritanism (add: 0% 0/0)
Christianity
KEEP *Orthodoxy
KEEP *Catholicism
KEEP *Protestantism (split: 100% 1/0)
ADD -Lutheranism
ADD -Anglicanism (-100% 0/1)
ADD -Calvinism
DON'T ADD -Babtists (-100% 0/1)
DON'T ADD -Anababtists (100% 1/0)
DON'T ADD -Unitarians (-100% 0/1)
ADD Islam (split: -100% 0/1)
ADD *Kharijites (0% 0/0)
KEEP *Shiite
DON'T ADD *Ghulat (0% 0/0)
KEEP *Sunni
DON'T ADD *Zikri (0% 0/0)
Split more than suggested (0% 0/0)
DON'T ADD Mandaeism (add: -100% 0/1)
ADD Hinduism (split: 0% 0/0)
*Agama Hindu Dharma (Javanese Hinduism) (0% 0/0)
ADD *Shaivism (0% 0/0)
ADD *Shaktism (0% 0/0)
ADD *Smartism (0% 0/0)
ADD *Vaishnavism (0% 0/0)
Split more than suggested (0% 0/0)
ADD Buddhism (split: -100% 0/1)
ADD *Mahayana (0% 0/0)
ADD *Theravada (0% 0/0)
ADD *Vajrayana (0% 0/0)
Split more than suggested (0% 0/0)
Confucianism (renamed to Oriental syncretism) (split: -100% 0/1)
ADD *Taoism (0% 0/0)
ADD *Shintoism (0% 0/0)
Split more than suggested (0% 0/0)
ADD Jainism (add: -100% 0/1)
ADD Sikhism (add: 100% 1/0)
DON'T ADD Zoroastrianism (add 0% 0/0)
DON'T ADD Gnosticism (add 0% 0/0)
ADD Vaishnavism (add 0% 0/0) (THIS IS A REPEAT OF POLL UNDER HINDUISM)
ADD Pagans: (split: 0% 0/0)
ADD *Animism (0% 0/0) - believe that all things have their soul (Navajo for example)
ADD *Pantheism (0% 0/0) - many gods (Inca, Aztecs, Maya, ancient European religions)
ADD *Shamanism (0% 0/0) - believe in good and evil spirits (african tribes, CENTRAL ASIA)
Split pagans more than suggested (0% 0/0)
Add more other religions than suggested (0% 0/0) NO WAY
Don't split religions, merge them (less religions than in Eu2) (0% 0/0) NO WAY