Could you send me the 4-month old version Marty? I'd like to play with the colors a bit for those screenshots.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I just want to point out that China runs the two mouths of the Panama canal, I didn't know if you had that in or not considering there is no America's Screenshots, but still worth a reminder 
EDIT: And what is of Iraq, if you do follow a realistic story line, will you have them as a puppet of USA? Or will you have a democratic government with military control of Iraq, and passage for the US?
EDIT: And what is of Iraq, if you do follow a realistic story line, will you have them as a puppet of USA? Or will you have a democratic government with military control of Iraq, and passage for the US?
Iraq will probably be made a puppet via event, but that's for another thread.
Panama will own Colon as far as I know.
Panama will own Colon as far as I know.
In reality, Panama does own Colon, The U.S. gave it up to them in the year 2000 (?).
Ya, the Chinese control the mouth's of the canal though, and I have heard rumors that they have a small base there with troops, ill do some research.
EDIT: Links
http://www.eagleforum.org/psr/1999/nov99/psrnov99.html
http://www.hope-of-israel.org/panama.htm
http://www.politicsamericanstyle.com/panama_canal.htm
EDIT: Links
http://www.eagleforum.org/psr/1999/nov99/psrnov99.html
http://www.hope-of-israel.org/panama.htm
http://www.politicsamericanstyle.com/panama_canal.htm
Last edited:
but The treaties give delivery they include the possibility that United States intervenes militarily, in case threats exist against the security or the neutrality gives the Canal of Panama.
I don't think China would even attempt to keep the canal in case of a war, they simply do not have the military or naval capability to hold it and they know this.
Of course. The U.S. navy would easily be able to awlk all over Chinese portion of the canal, being that the canal is closer to the U.S. than to China.
I think that you should change the title-screen background. to much images.... maybe you should have a background with all the alliances logos or something. just my oppinion....
I think the images are colorful and add life, they also give the person something to look-at during load up, but your Idea was good, too. Either way, I'm sure the background will be fine.
http://www.mil.no/multimedia/archive/00016/Lederutdanning_-_tea_16571a.mpg
Except for the music being annoying at some parts, I think that video is pretty damn cool. Thank the Norwegian propaganda department for that one.
Except for the music being annoying at some parts, I think that video is pretty damn cool. Thank the Norwegian propaganda department for that one.
Are we going to use this as the opening video?
I think it's pretty cool, so we probably should.
Might be a good idea to make Africa into regional states as opposed to actual countries to save the tags. Then just use high dissent event's to simulate different regional wars, and perhaps let the player choose which side should win so that they can get the government of that state. Sorry to just run around your forums making little comments and suggestions, but I figured it couldn't hurt. Also I really like the idea, could be a fun game
I was able to test the map, looking pretty good however i encountered a problem.when you modify the country names it sticks even in the other scenarios. i.e when i play the grand scenario the ussr is titled zambia and rep. spain is bangladesh and so on. is the reason for this just because its early and will be changed later on? Hope so