Why isn't Exeter Cornish? Hopefully you didn't confuse my early comments, what I was reffering to was the 1187 map, not the 1066 map.
Also you wheren't convinced about the presence of Persian peoples living in the Dihistan and Turkmen provinces in 1066?
And did you make the Bolgars 'Turkish' as opposed to 'Turkic', I though Turkish was only going to be applied to Oghuz Turks while everything else would be 'Turkic', also I know you seemed pretty set in stone over the names but could 'Oghuz' be a better name then 'Turkish'? BTW though, I still like my '3 Turks idea' more then this set up
I'm not going to get into the Norse thing, but really, the difference between the Norse was less then the German and Italian dialects, I don't really see the point of removing Swedish if you're not going to 'all the way'