Exeter should be Welsh in 1066 province. To make Devon Welsh and Exeter not is like making England English and London French. 
Semi-Lobster said:Also for Cornwall, in 1187, it should be Exeter that was stil Celtic, not Devon, mainly because where the province is.
I'll leave the Gaelic question to Brian because, well, I tired of typing right now!![]()
Semi-Lobster said:I'll leave the Gaelic question to Brian because, well, I tired of typing right now!![]()
Finellach said:Name suggestions? Merge Cumans and Pechenegs with Turkish tag and leave it as Turkish...or if you insist rename it to Turkic.
There shouldn't be two Turkish-Turkic tags IMO.
Well this is not popularity mod. And also everything can pass if you simply explain people that there is barely no difference between Norman and Frankish tag.
Also Saxons were already being "normanized" in 1066(after all game happens with William conquering England) and it would work perfectly if the new children would get more modern english names after 1066. As I said remove Saxon and replace it with English but keep Saxon names. The children will get more modern names and their parents will still have their anglo-saxon names. Also as pointed out you can rename English to Anglian to make it more medieval sounding...IMO Anglian sounds much better than English...but thats me.![]()
Calgacus said:OK, Turkish and Turkic it's gonna be.
Finellach said:I don't see what would be so strange...we know that Normans were Frankish thus there is nothing to be strange.
Nothing like that is needed.
The names between Cumans, Pechenegs and Turkish tag are in 98% cases the same...if no 99%
If we would have enough tags....with merger of Turkic tribes this would be posibble. The 'none' tag should not IMO be used...there are too much problems with this and we need none tag.
I'd advise against that. There is no point in doing this.
1. There is no such thing as Mordvin culture or names...this name is term devised for two distinct finno-ugric people living there
2. These people were called Volga Finns....I think that speaks for itself...
Calgacus said:What would we call the culture?
It is a big decision, coz anyone can throw in the argument "if we split them, then why not ... ." I will wait for more feedback, esp. from Scandinavians.
The name list would be equally problematic in either case.
That would be great, if you can do it.
Finellach said:Exeter should be Welsh in 1066 province. To make Devon Welsh and Exeter not is like making England English and London French.![]()
Semi-Lobster said:Let's not get into this again![]()
I do admit three cultures for the Turks is rather excessive. If we can address the name thing, then I'd be happy to see them merged![]()
Semi-Lobster said:2.They where called Volga Finns by the Rus, they didn't really care about any difference between the two peoples. And like I said a bit earlier, it would be easier to lump Finnish. Estonian, Karelian, and Mordvin into one tag, and Lappish and Samoyed into another. A few additional 'Mordvin' names would only to balance out things a bit.
Semi-Lobster said:Bohemian I guess, although that does belittle the achievements of the moravians, but there aren't a lot of candidates for a better name.
Semi-Lobster said:I don't see how, Welsh and Cornish names where nearly identical other then for some spelling variations every once in a while Breton nobility though used French names.
Calgacus said:The name thing has been addressed as well as it can be. It is Turkic and Turkish for now.
I like this. I do need a believable collective name for the Lapps-Samoyed.![]()
No, my point was that a British list would have the same name problems as a Gaelic list. We'd have Diarmits and Conchobars as counts, dukes and kings in Scotland.
Semi-Lobster said:I propose Finnic/Finnish for Finnish, Karelian, Estonian and Mordvin and Uralic for Lapps and Samoyed.
Finellach said:Having both Turkic and Turkish culture will never pass...no offense.
Semi-Lobster said:Let's not get into this again![]()
Then what happens when the events start fireing then?
But what about Islamic names?
I though you said you test it and nothing bad happened?![]()
I do admit three cultures for the Turks is rather excessive. If we can address the name thing, then I'd be happy to see them merged![]()
1.The difference only exists due to the effects of the introduction of turkic peoples into this region.
2.They where called Volga Finns by the Rus, they didn't really care about any difference between the two peoples. And like I said a bit earlier, it would be easier to lump Finnish. Estonian, Karelian, and Mordvin into one tag, and Lappish and Samoyed into another. A few additional 'Mordvin' names would only to balance out things a bit.
Bohemian I guess, although that does belittle the achievements of the moravians, but there aren't a lot of candidates for a better name.
I don't see how, Welsh and Cornish names where nearly identical other then for some spelling variations every once in a while Breton nobility though used French names.
Byakhiam said:Uralic sounds weird for a culture in Lappland. Lappish, in the sense of "people living in Lappland" (in Russian, Finnish and Swedish Lapplands) actually makes sense there.
Finnish should be renamed to Finnic however, since it's going to be including Mordvins, Estonians and Ingerians all.
BTW everyone, if we get rid of Moravians, we have a free tag. I'll mention some contenders just to get started: Sards, Gall-Gaidheal, Guanche, Moravians, Frisians. Let's discuss this.
Finellach said:However it is a fact they were called as such and it is also a fact that they belong to Finnish branch of Finno-Ugric languages.
Wiki said:In the opinion of linguists, probably even in the 10th–12th centuries all Slavs spoke generally Common Slavonic: the same language, with very slight differences.
Linguistic differentiation received impetus from the dispersion of the Slavic peoples over large territory - which in Central Europe exceeded the current extent of Slavic-speaking majorities. Written documents of the 9th, 10th and 11th centuries already have some local linguistic features. For example the Freising monuments show a language which contains some phonetic and lexical elements peculiar to Slovenian dialects (e.g. rhotacism, the word krilatec).
Semi-Lobster said:Agreed, I guess Uralic would never work and Lappish is just vague enough to apply to both Lapps and Samoyed.
Semi-Lobster said:The Sards would be a nice addition, Manx (Gall-Gaidheal)... really wouldn't cover much other then Man, Guanche? NO, that would mean we'd have to give ever Berber tribe their own culture, Moravian? Maybe, if we can find anything to use for it, Frisian, I guess that could work.
Semi-Lobster said:Guanche? NO, that would mean we'd have to give ever Berber tribe their own culture,
Byakhiam said:Single province culture in a pagan province about as reclused as Iceland isn't exactly gameplay priority though imo.![]()
Calgacus said:I kinda agree, but only, of course, given the scarcity of tags.
Finellach said:Sorry but we must. There is no chance I can accept Turkish and Turkic co-existing on the map...it's ridiculous. Why don't we put German and Germanic as well....hillarious...
Nothing, it won't trigger since the country already is English.
It will trigger correctly for Danish and other provinces if they are still there.
They are not "islamic" but Arabic/Turkish. Also I found three names that can be characterized as islamic....the chance in getting that name is quite big.![]()
There are events that use the none tag.
Indeed.
However it is a fact they were called as such and it is also a fact that they belong to Finnish branch of Finno-Ugric languages.
I say if you are really so keen on uniting the tags....although if you can have Irish and Scottish then you can have Moravian and Bohemian...then name it Moravian since whole region was under Great Moravia.