Work up a plan for late March. I haven't decided to attack, I mean liberate Sweden but just in case. HJ Tulp, you are in charge of the operation.
Torstor said:To the Minister of Propaganda :
Dear sir,
I write to you in the name of my fellow comrades that fight and hold with me the iron line against the evil red tide together with our finnish allies. But there are things that bother almost all of us simple soldiers here and put up fears in us. Rumors have spread that our best commanders are in a great state of indecision and even words of a purge have been heard here at the frontline, so far from home. I am sure those rumors are just lies, spread by the communist propaganda and our generals are well working together to make us crush our enemies. So i would like to ask you for a small favour: Please send us a few words from the Headquarter to crush those silly accusations and rumors and rise the moral of my fellow soldiers here at the northern front! I am sure this will strengthen our will to win even more and make us endure the hard climate a bit better.
Three cheers to our great Commanders !
Three cheers to the hero of murmansk, General gonzo !
Three cheers to our great minister of propaganda !
yours sincerely
Obergefreiter Schultz
P.S. Please send us more bottles of beer, general gonzo keeps smashing the at the wall...
:rofl: :rofl:
gorion83 said:Excuse me, but instead of wasting divisions in Sweden, why don't we free Finland? I think that using the same amount of divisions that we would need for puppeting Sweden we could simply encircle the russians in Finland.
After Finland is secured we could puppet Sweden, without worrying about russian attacks.
FlyingDutchman said:Lets draw up a plan. When the mechs are built we can review the feasability of the plan relative to what the other fronts are like. If I have to guess we will be up to our ears in Soviets and will not be able to spare the mechs.
As for paratroopers we have 4-6 of them, but no transports. If we did then we could use them and some tac bombers to do most of the work. I would suggest that if the plan is to be put in action that we use the armour from the west front to do the work. 3 Armour (PzIV types) is more than enough and does not rob the East Front of the mechs+AT. Assuming we do it that way then I say go ahead.
De_Genius said:And maybe we should consider building a couple of transport planes though expensive and costly. With 4-6 paras we could make a few surprise attacks here and there. What does the rest of the cabinet suggest about his ?
kriegerpoet said:gorino83 is right, do the thinks in the right order.
1. liberate finland
2. Annex Sweden) I'm against any Offensive in Sweden at the moment!
Bringing Spain into the alliance is an option we should think about, but it only makes sense if the have enough troops to defend what they have alone and the gain of Gibraltar will be minimal, if we don’t have Suez…
Right now we have the forces and the opponents (or lack there of) to launch a offensive in Finland and maybe take Helsinki. However we will not be able to keep what we would gain and the only thing happening would be the total annexation of Finland into the Bolshevik Empire and the threatening of Norway. Liberating Finland is thus out of the question.De_Genius said:Annex Sweden ?? We are talking about puppetting it in order to get their troops, navy and airforce. The liberation of Finland will be easier since we also have the swedish troops there, IF we do Sweden first.
I agree on Spain. But Gibraltar alone is important too. That way we will have no more landings in the Mediterranianand all the transports will have to move around the Cape.
HJ Tulp said:Right now we have the forces and the opponents (or lack there of) to launch a offensive in Finland and maybe take Helsinki. However we will not be able to keep what we would gain and the only thing happening would be the total annexation of Finland into the Bolshevik Empire and the threatening of Norway. Liberating Finland is thus out of the question.
That's exactly what I support, I will draw up a plan and then we decide upon it.Zuckergußgebäck said:GENTLEMEN!
Let us reach a compromise!
First we take out the soviet pocket in the Ukraine, THEN we decide wether we should advance further in the 'true' east front (I.E. Over byelorus and the remainder of the Ukraine) OR if we should open a second scandinavian front.
Secundo, we don't have para transports.
sliver legion said:Just wondering why "liberate Sweden" with so many fronts already active. Other than that try to take out the Soviet pocets.
The Swedish campaign isn't ment as a second front, it's ment as a quick charge to get Sweden on our side. Gribraltar can be done by the Spanish, invading the Caucasus would need a large amount of forces while the Swedish Campaign would need only 6 mechs or alike for a limited amount of time.Elias Tarfarius said:Indeed, but I hope this will be fixed soon if the budget allows.
Who knew Scandinavia would cause so much dissent among the high command and government officials. Other than the hot women, I see no reason for it to be the focus of so much attention right now. The Russian front deserves our focus so that we can destory the Red Army and drive Bolshevism away from our borders! If there is a secondary front I would like to see opened right now, it would be either Girbralter (once Spain joins the Axis and we take control of their military) or the Caucasus and the rich oil fields there in (once we get mil access via Turkey and a good force that can fight in the mountains). I know Gonzo is going crazy with boredom but the Riech must have its priorities straight. Understood people?