And still no sign of Royal Navy![]()
And still no sign of Royal Navy![]()
Are you expecting it to arrive to the land frontline?
I'll be soon posting an overview, showing the fronts, resource situation etc. including the naval situation.
What the point then in mentioning kaiser fleet blocking la Manche strait and not telling what happened after. It's kinda wraps AAR's consistency
Wow, I wouldn't expect that...
Not blocking. My fleet was there sinking convoys, but as I mentioned in the previous update, I moved it away from there to combat British landing attempts.
As has been pointed out by others, this is very very unrealistic for WWI timeline. The British should have naval superiority by at least a semi-comfortable margin; they kept most of the German fleet penned up for the war as the Germans were simply incapable of facing the entire British fleet at once. The one really main battle (Jutland) came about because the Germans were trying to lure a small part of the British fleet into a trap. Parking the German fleet off the coast of France should be the recipe for a vast naval disaster, and it's amazing that the British Grand Fleet didn't even bother escorting their transports during an attempted landing.
The German navy in WWI should be confined to U-boats and small groups of commerce raiders operating on the high seas, as well as perhaps attempts to lure parts of the British fleet into a trap. But naval superiority simply shouldn't be possible bar a vast ship-building program.
I am also disappointed by the relatively light defense of Paris. Where was the French army? The German Schlieffen plan was simply to surround it (with the French army) and force it into surrender.
the crown kept a peacetime army of 247,432 regular troops organized in four guards regiments, 68 infantry regiments and 33 of cavalry serving all over the world. The majority of the line infantry regiments had two battalions in the Regular Army one of which was usually overseas, and the other trained recruits in the United Kingdom. Most Regiments also had two battalions of reservists who were in their 30's and 40's. In August 1914, in addition to the regular army, there were three forms of reserves. The Army Reserve was 145,350 strong, the Special Reserve had another 64,000 men and the National Reserve had some 215,000. This totaled on paper a mobilized force of almost 700,000 men however only 150,000 men were able to be formed into the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) that was sent to the continent. This 'contemptible little army' of six infantry divisions and one of cavalry was outnumbered by the Germans on the western front by a figure of more that ten to one. The Royal Flying Corps was included with the army until 1918 and at the outbreak of the war consisted of 84 air planes.
+1
and also british had a army 5 million strong in north france.i dont see it
+2
The situation where German Navy can prevent UK landing troops in France is just absurd...
I'm beginning to have my doubts about this one...
As has been pointed out by others, this is very very unrealistic for WWI timeline. The British should have naval superiority by at least a semi-comfortable margin; they kept most of the German fleet penned up for the war as the Germans were simply incapable of facing the entire British fleet at once. The one really main battle (Jutland) came about because the Germans were trying to lure a small part of the British fleet into a trap. Parking the German fleet off the coast of France should be the recipe for a vast naval disaster, and it's amazing that the British Grand Fleet didn't even bother escorting their transports during an attempted landing.
The German navy in WWI should be confined to U-boats and small groups of commerce raiders operating on the high seas, as well as perhaps attempts to lure parts of the British fleet into a trap. But naval superiority simply shouldn't be possible bar a vast ship-building program.