The game allows it, but lets be honest here, a national socialistic germany is the driving force of the entire game, it would be kinda dull without.
I already used this joke a few threads ago but...
Hitler... is out of the way.
- 2
- 1
The game allows it, but lets be honest here, a national socialistic germany is the driving force of the entire game, it would be kinda dull without.
I don't want to be rude, but what does this have to do with anything? I think you're over analyzing the whole thing a bit too much.I don't say that everything about Staufenberg was good. It just was an example to describe what I mean.
There were other possibilities for sure. But in my eyes as someone who is German and feels German but has in part Jewish ancestors, it feels totally wrong to play my country with the only possibility to be a nazi. E. G. there have been huge groups of members of the kpd and SPD wich were persecuted. Why shouldn't they even have a possibility to try to change the way their country is ruled.
There are ways to steer the Reich towards democracy using national foci.
However, don't expect a "Hitler kills himself" button.
Also, people should start reasoning if they are going to disagree like that.
Hello I'm German but I don't like the hole stuff of nazism at all. So I wonder if it would be possible to play a democratic German Reich, e. G. If something like the Staufenberg assassination wouldn't have failed and would have happened earlier like in 1937 or 1938.
Is there a kind of way to play like this confirmed or are there plans that this is eventually possible?
Well lets play it out, how would the game be interesting if Germany was Democratic say by 1938 or 39', does Russia invade Poland in 41'-42' after the Winter War. Maybe Japan's war with China draws World Tension up high enough to get something moving and joins the Comintern or makes a Pact with SU?
I don't want to be rude, but what does this have to do with anything? I think you're over analyzing the whole thing a bit too much.
I mean, I'm Croatian and you don't see me being offended by the Independent State of Croatia that's in the game. It's representing history as it was back then and giving you the opportunity to change it as you want (something that's been done in every HoI game to date including games like Arsenal of Democracy and Darkest Hour) there's no point in bringing up political commentary and personal world views in video game design that is BASED upon historical accuracy.
It's a "feature" in the new forums, I've seen a lot complain about it at XenForoI think something like that was quickly visible in the latest WWW. I'll try to look it up.
EDIT: Found it: the Soviet focus tree decision "Alliance with the USSR" will let Germany and USSR form the "Berlin-Moscow faction" and disband Axis. See it in the video below:
RE-EDIT: damnations, the video losed my timestamp. It's at 9:25.
"Capitalize" against the "Capitalists"?I kind of hope the red alert scenario would be a meaningful possibility in that situation. If I'm remembering right from the dev diaries, communist nations are allowed a more generous pace of military buildup compared to democracies, so to my completely uneducated perspective it seems that having world tension stay low would disproportionately benefit the soviet union.
I imagine a fully industrialized and mobilized soviet union, without the infrastructural damage and population losses incurred during Barbarossa, could be pretty good match for the allies in Western Europe. I hope the AI is aggressive enough to capitalize on it.
Yeah. If the AI is willing to act the soviets can probably get a lot done within world tension. The devs mentioned that aggressive action by communists raises WT less than actions by fascists.I imagine a fully industrialized and mobilized soviet union, without the infrastructural damage and population losses incurred during Barbarossa, could be pretty good match for the allies in Western Europe. I hope the AI is aggressive enough to capitalize on it.
My 'Democratic' Germany will still be very Prussian, Nationalist, and expansionist![]()
![]()
Democracies still can go to war by decision (e.g., Danzig of War) and consumer goods are produced by civilian factories, which are seperate from the tank-building military factories - though admittedly I do believe military buildup does have some counterpush in democracies, from what I have seen so far.Democracies can't declare wars whenever they want. They can't use most of their industry to produce glorious tanks instead of consumer goods.
I thought democracies could also fabricate claims but they could not declare war on other democracies and taking territory for themselves in peace negotiations would be more expensive.Democracies still can go to war by decision (e.g., Danzig of War) and consumer goods are produced by civilian factories, which are seperate from the tank-building military factories - though admittedly I do believe military buildup does have some counterpush in democracies, from what I have seen so far.
Democracies still can go to war by decision (e.g., Danzig of War) and consumer goods are produced by civilian factories, which are seperate from the tank-building military factories - though admittedly I do believe military buildup does have some counterpush in democracies, from what I have seen so far.