Gamespot review 80%

[Fredrik II]

http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/heartsofironiidoomsday/review.html?sid=6147479

"Longer campaigns allow for more-satisfying conclusions; great cold war flavor, with a nuclear race, spies, and military hardware specific to the era; tremendous amount of content for an expansion pack, especially one retailing for under $20."

"Basically, if you want more Hearts of Iron II, Doomsday is a great bet."

F

 

[Spricar]

Looks like they reviewed different version from mine...Theirs has an invasion of Japan included

 

[unmerged(38672)]

http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/heartsofironiidoomsday/review.html?sid=6147479

"Longer campaigns allow for more-satisfying conclusions; great cold war flavor, with a nuclear race, spies, and military hardware specific to the era; tremendous amount of content for an expansion pack, especially one retailing for under $20."

"Basically, if you want more Hearts of Iron II, Doomsday is a great bet."

F

They should have added: "More and bigger bugs than ´Starship Troopers´"

 

[Fredrik II]

They should have added: "More and bigger They should have added: "More and bigger bugs than ´Starship Troopers´"

Feel free to report it...

F

 

[unmerged(38672)]

Feel free to report it...

F

I think someone at Paradox should give an official reply in the thread complaining about the new experience system (which hopefully is a bug). Many are very angry, frustrated and disappointed (including myself).

http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showthread.php?t=240109

 

[Fredrik II]

I think someone at Paradox should give an official reply in the thread complaining about the new experience system (which hopefully is a bug). Many are very angry, frustrated and disappointed (including myself).

http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showthread.php?t=240109

Well, this is not really a bug... it is a design decision. But we're following all discussions on the forums and adjusting some things according to feedback.

Slightly OT though... pls continue the discussion in the thread above. You do not need to worry about us ignoring your feedback...

F

 

[Spricar]

Well, this is not really a bug... it is a design decision. But we're following all discussions on the forums and adjusting some things according to feedback.

Slightly OT though... pls continue the discussion in the thread above. You do not need to worry about us ignoring your feedback...

F

What about my question about Japan scenario?

 

[The Witch-King]

I like these bits:

"Even though wondering "What if?" has always been a popular pastime for armchair generals, Paradox Interactive has stayed away from speculation."

"[Doomsday] takes Paradox into the world of alternative history for the first time."

:rofl:
:rofl:
:rofl:

 

[Fredrik II]

What about my question about Japan scenario?

What about it?

 

[Johan]

Looks like they reviewed different version from mine...Theirs has an invasion of Japan included

That scenario has been around since hoi2 1.0.

Operation Downfall or something.

 

[Sovereign]

That scenario has been around since hoi2 1.0.

Operation Downfall or something.

I've said it before and I say it again, Top Game, The Dogs Bollocks (as we say in Blighty). Although improvements or alterations may be welcome I wouldn't want you to get the impression you're fan-base only complains about every little thing that isn't exactly as they think it should be.

But don't think I don't know what you're doing in terms of when you choose to release patches, you marketeers you.

 

[unmerged(6105)]

They should have added: "More and bigger bugs than ´Starship Troopers´"

i am yet to encounter one bug, what be yours in particular?

 

[Spricar]

Oops...My mistake

 

[unmerged(38672)]

i am yet to encounter one bug, what be yours in particular?

Have you tried to use the Editor and then started a game?

 

[Darth Tracid]

if you guys don´t stop to post the same things in every thread (as well as turning threads completely OT!), then I will get mad. and trust me. you DON´T want to see me mad!