After putting in a lot of hours, I am really frustrated overall with game performance. I literally cannot play the game "zoomed in" on my decent, 2 year old laptop on the lowest possible graphics settings, and I get frustrated enough and quit at about 1880 when "zoomed out". I honestly do not know who they are marketing this game to if most people can barely run it. If this were the latest first-person shooter, or even a flight simulator, I would understand high graphics/cpu requirements. But this is a grand strategy game and the focus should be on strategy rather than graphics. Personally, I am not playing Vic3 because of the pretty, albeit poorly designed, UI. I do not care about clouds, visable railroads/factories, etc. Vic2 graphics were totally acceptable to me. I really hope the devs allow more optionality with graphics (maybe let us turn off the "zoomed-in" mode?)
I expect a lot of pushback given that this forum is biased towards more heavy gamers... But please think about the average player here.
I expect a lot of pushback given that this forum is biased towards more heavy gamers... But please think about the average player here.
- 24
- 4
- 1